On 11/22/2021 03:08:46 PM, Julien Roy wrote:
emerge -pv --depclean dev-libs/imath
Many thanks,
Helmut
Hi,
emerge -vp @preserved-rebuild only displays
emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy "dev-libs/imath:0".
(dependency required by "@preserved-rebuild" [argument])
How to find out what requires dev-libs/imath:0 and how to fix that?
Many thanks for a hint,
Helmut
> On 2018-12-29, at 12:33, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
>
> On 12/29/2018 05:03:51 PM, Andrew Udvare wrote:
>> > On Dec 29, 2018, at 10:47, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
>> >
>> > How can I find out the list of packages in @preserved-rebuild?
>> There's a JSON file in /var/db/portage
>
> I don't have the
On 12/29/2018 05:09:02 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 11:03 AM Andrew Udvare
wrote:
>
> > On Dec 29, 2018, at 10:47, Helmut Jarausch
wrote:
> >
> > How can I find out the list of packages in @preserved-rebuild?
>
> There's a JSON file in /var/db/portage
>
Not sure if
On 12/29/2018 05:03:51 PM, Andrew Udvare wrote:
> On Dec 29, 2018, at 10:47, Helmut Jarausch
wrote:
>
> How can I find out the list of packages in @preserved-rebuild?
There's a JSON file in /var/db/portage
I don't have the folder /var/db/portage here.
Thanks,
Helmut
On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 11:03 AM Andrew Udvare wrote:
>
> > On Dec 29, 2018, at 10:47, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> >
> > How can I find out the list of packages in @preserved-rebuild?
>
> There's a JSON file in /var/db/portage
>
Not sure if there is anything that directly targets the API here, but
> On Dec 29, 2018, at 10:47, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
>
> How can I find out the list of packages in @preserved-rebuild?
There's a JSON file in /var/db/portage
Hi,
I have some old packages like dev-qt/qtcore:4 on my machine, and other
packages which need this.
Therefore emerge -vp @preserved-rebuild doesn't work.
How can I find out the list of packages in @preserved-rebuild?
Many thanks for a hint,
Helmut
On Wed, Dec 07 2016, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 12:30 PM, allan gottlieb wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 07 2016, Neil Bothwick wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 07 Dec 2016 10:54:59 -0500, allan gottlieb wrote:
>>>
>>emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy
On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 12:30 PM, allan gottlieb wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 07 2016, Neil Bothwick wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 07 Dec 2016 10:54:59 -0500, allan gottlieb wrote:
>>
>>> >>emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy "dev-lang/python:3.3".
>>> >>(dependency required by
On Wed, Dec 07 2016, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Wed, 07 Dec 2016 10:54:59 -0500, allan gottlieb wrote:
>
>> >>emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy "dev-lang/python:3.3".
>> >>(dependency required by "@preserved-rebuild" [argument])
>> >
>> > Does "qdepends -r dev-lang/python:3.3"
On Wed, 07 Dec 2016 10:54:59 -0500, allan gottlieb wrote:
> >>emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy "dev-lang/python:3.3".
> >>(dependency required by "@preserved-rebuild" [argument])
> >
> > Does "qdepends -r dev-lang/python:3.3" reveal anything helpful?
>
>allan ~ # qdepends
On Wed, Dec 07 2016, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Wed, 07 Dec 2016 10:11:56 -0500, allan gottlieb wrote:
>
>>emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy "dev-lang/python:3.3".
>>(dependency required by "@preserved-rebuild" [argument])
>
> Does "qdepends -r dev-lang/python:3.3" reveal anything
On Wed, 07 Dec 2016 10:11:56 -0500, allan gottlieb wrote:
>emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy "dev-lang/python:3.3".
>(dependency required by "@preserved-rebuild" [argument])
Does "qdepends -r dev-lang/python:3.3" reveal anything helpful?
--
Neil Bothwick
Computers are like Old
On Wed, Dec 07 2016, Dale wrote:
> allan gottlieb wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 06 2016, Adam Carter wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 1:37 PM, allan gottlieb wrote:
>>>
I can't complete an emerge @preserved-rebuild due to the lack of
python3.3.
However, I read
allan gottlieb wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 06 2016, Adam Carter wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 1:37 PM, allan gottlieb wrote:
>>
>>> I can't complete an emerge @preserved-rebuild due to the lack of
>>> python3.3.
>>>
>>> However, I read the news article and have set the python3
On Tue, Dec 06 2016, Adam Carter wrote:
> Also, what's your $PYTHON_TARGETS ?
emerge --info includes
PYTHON_SINGLE_TARGET="python2_7" PYTHON_TARGETS="python2_7 python3_4"
which looks right to me.
thanks,
allan
On Tue, Dec 06 2016, Adam Carter wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 1:37 PM, allan gottlieb wrote:
>
>> I can't complete an emerge @preserved-rebuild due to the lack of
>> python3.3.
>>
>> However, I read the news article and have set the python3 interpreter to
>> python3.4
>>
>>
Also, what's your $PYTHON_TARGETS ?
On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 1:37 PM, allan gottlieb wrote:
> I can't complete an emerge @preserved-rebuild due to the lack of
> python3.3.
>
> However, I read the news article and have set the python3 interpreter to
> python3.4
>
>allan ~ # eselect python list --python3
>
I can't complete an emerge @preserved-rebuild due to the lack of
python3.3.
However, I read the news article and have set the python3 interpreter to
python3.4
allan ~ # eselect python list --python3
Available Python 3 interpreters:
[1] python3.3
[2] python3.4 *
allan ~ #
On Monday, March 23, 2015 4:38:08 PM Dale wrote:
Howdy,
For the past week or so, I been getting this endless loop with
preserved-rebuild. I did a emerge -ev world last night and it still
gives me the same thing. I'm stumped with the info emerge is giving me
again.
root@fireball / #
Howdy,
For the past week or so, I been getting this endless loop with
preserved-rebuild. I did a emerge -ev world last night and it still
gives me the same thing. I'm stumped with the info emerge is giving me
again.
root@fireball / # emerge @preserved-rebuild
These are the packages that would
Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Preserve-libs
Wow. I searched the forums, googled and nothing helped. I never
thought to check the wiki, of course, I rarely go to the wiki either. I
keep forgetting the thing exists.
Is it me or does the search function at fgo pretty
On 03/23/2015 05:12 PM, Dale wrote:
Is it me or does the search function at fgo pretty much stink? I find a
lot of times I type in something and where it should show what I
searched for, it is blank which means it kicked all my search terms
out. Surely it ain't just me. o_O
It's not just
Have you tried running python-updater? I have no idea if it would fix it,
but worth a try?
On Mar 23, 2015 17:38, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Howdy,
For the past week or so, I been getting this endless loop with
preserved-rebuild. I did a emerge -ev world last night and it still
gives me
Daniel Frey wrote:
On 03/23/2015 05:12 PM, Dale wrote:
Is it me or does the search function at fgo pretty much stink? I find a
lot of times I type in something and where it should show what I
searched for, it is blank which means it kicked all my search terms
out. Surely it ain't just me.
Michael Cook wrote:
Have you tried running python-updater? I have no idea if it would fix
it, but worth a try?
I don't know if it would or not but removing the links that was
triggering it then running revdep-rebuild did fix it. It seems this is
one of those times that portage just can't do
Not sure why, but for some reason running emerge @preserved-rebuild does not
seem to fix some preserved libs links:
!!! existing preserved libs:
package: x11-libs/pango-1.34.1
* - /usr/lib/libpangox-1.0.so.0
* - /usr/lib/libpangox-1.0.so.0.3000.1
This is all caused by some hack I have in
On Sun, 15 Dec 2013 09:51:39 +, Mick wrote:
!!! existing preserved libs:
package: x11-libs/pango-1.34.1
* - /usr/lib/libpangox-1.0.so.0
* - /usr/lib/libpangox-1.0.so.0.3000.1
* used by /opt/avast4workstation/bin/avastgui (app-
antivirus/avast4workstation-1.3.0-r2)
Use
On 09:51 Sun 15 Dec , Mick wrote:
Not sure why, but for some reason running emerge @preserved-rebuild does not
seem to fix some preserved libs links:
!!! existing preserved libs:
package: x11-libs/pango-1.34.1
* - /usr/lib/libpangox-1.0.so.0
* - /usr/lib/libpangox-1.0.so.0.3000.1
Hi. I am using gentoo unstable and after this last update when I tried
to do emerge @preserved-rebuild I get the following:
These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
Calculating dependencies done!
emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy net-libs/xulrunner:1.9.
(dependency
On Sun, 12 May 2013 02:50:44 -0400, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
Hi. I am using gentoo unstable and after this last update when I tried
to do emerge @preserved-rebuild I get the following:
I didn't know Gentoo specifically made an unstable version, it's
generally rock solid for me.
These
Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Sun, 12 May 2013 02:50:44 -0400, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
Hi. I am using gentoo unstable and after this last update when I tried
to do emerge @preserved-rebuild I get the following:
I didn't know Gentoo specifically made an unstable
On 12/05/13 14:29, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Sun, 12 May 2013 02:50:44 -0400, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
Hi. I am using gentoo unstable and after this last update when I tried
to do emerge @preserved-rebuild I get the following:
I didn't
Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 12/05/13 14:29, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Sun, 12 May 2013 02:50:44 -0400, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
Hi. I am using gentoo unstable and after this last update when I tried
to do emerge
130512 cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Sun, 12 May 2013 02:50:44 -0400, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
I am using gentoo unstable ...
I didn't know Gentoo specifically made an unstable version,
it's generally rock solid for me.
By unstable I meant
On 12/05/2013 13:29, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Sun, 12 May 2013 02:50:44 -0400, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
Hi. I am using gentoo unstable and after this last update when I tried
to do emerge @preserved-rebuild I get the following:
I didn't
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 01:06:36 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
I agree that the tree should be in sync, but how come I was able to
unmerge the package? It must keep the information somewhere -- and it
didn't tell me anything about having packages with no ebuilds -- that
would have been OK.
I have a fair number of preserved-libs, but it will not run at all and
gives the rather strange message:
Calculating dependencies... done!
emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy dev-tex/mplib:0.
(dependency required by @preserved-rebuild)
Now I have no such package and an eix seems to indicate
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 10:48 AM, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
I have a fair number of preserved-libs, but it will not run at all and
gives the rather strange message:
Calculating dependencies... done!
emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy dev-tex/mplib:0.
(dependency required by
Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 10:48 AM, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
I have a fair number of preserved-libs, but it will not run at all and
gives the rather strange message:
Calculating dependencies... done!
emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy
Apparently, though unproven, at 22:35 on Sunday 12 December 2010,
cov...@ccs.covici.com did opine thusly:
Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 10:48 AM, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
I have a fair number of preserved-libs, but it will not run at all and
gives
Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 22:35 on Sunday 12 December 2010,
cov...@ccs.covici.com did opine thusly:
Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 10:48 AM, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
I have a fair number of
Apparently, though unproven, at 23:10 on Sunday 12 December 2010,
cov...@ccs.covici.com did opine thusly:
Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 22:35 on Sunday 12 December 2010,
cov...@ccs.covici.com did opine thusly:
Mark Knecht
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 23:10 on Sunday 12 December 2010,
cov...@ccs.covici.com did opine thusly:
Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 22:35 on Sunday 12 December
Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 23:10 on Sunday 12 December 2010,
cov...@ccs.covici.com did opine thusly:
Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 22:35 on Sunday 12 December 2010,
Apparently, though unproven, at 00:56 on Monday 13 December 2010,
cov...@ccs.covici.com did opine thusly:
One thing that is NOT a solution is to not delete the ebuild. That
results in your tree being out of sync with upstream. That is not
allowed.
I agree that the tree should be in
Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com
wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 23:10 on Sunday 12 December 2010,
cov...@ccs.covici.com did opine thusly:
Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
Apparently,
On Sunday 12 December 2010 21:41:08 Alan McKinnon wrote:
One thing that is NOT a solution is to not delete the ebuild.
Eh? Not deleting the ebuild is not a solution? Is that what you meant to
say?
--
Rgds
Peter. Linux Counter 5290, 1994-04-23.
Hello,
Well I keep getting the same 32 files to rebuild
even after running 'emerge @preserved-rebuild'
several times. Here is the list of files:
ebuild R ] sys-fs/reiserfsprogs-3.6.19-r2
[ebuild R ] sys-apps/util-linux-2.16.1
[ebuild R ] dev-libs/apr-1.3.9
[ebuild R ]
Well,
I got the same problem in a recent past.
What I did to solve this problem was to remove sys-libs/e2fsprogs-libs and to
install it again:
emerge -C e2fsprogs-libs
emerge -van1 e2fsprogs-libs
But I don't if it is good for your case.
Regards,
--
Ronan Arraes Jardim Chagas
Control and
On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 17:51:33 + (UTC), James wrote:
Well I keep getting the same 32 files to rebuild
even after running 'emerge @preserved-rebuild'
several times. Here is the list of files:
Where is the list of libraries causing the need for the rebuild?
This is given in the message that
On Thursday 17 December 2009 19:51:33 James wrote:
Hello,
Well I keep getting the same 32 files to rebuild
even after running 'emerge @preserved-rebuild'
several times. Here is the list of files:
ebuild R ] sys-fs/reiserfsprogs-3.6.19-r2
[snip]
ldd is your friend
run on those
Hi,
I'm in the middle of a world update. I'm sort of doing it in parts
because of the device-mapper issue. Anyway, I keep getting the
@preserved-rebuild at the end of the emerge. I run it and it wants to
run it again. When I run it again, it wants to run it again. It's the
same packages over
Dale writes:
I'm in the middle of a world update. I'm sort of doing it in parts
because of the device-mapper issue. Anyway, I keep getting the
@preserved-rebuild at the end of the emerge. I run it and it wants to
run it again. When I run it again, it wants to run it again. It's the
same
On Tuesday 10 November 2009 17:44:23 Dale wrote:
Hi,
I'm in the middle of a world update. I'm sort of doing it in parts
because of the device-mapper issue. Anyway, I keep getting the
@preserved-rebuild at the end of the emerge. I run it and it wants to
run it again. When I run it again,
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Tuesday 10 November 2009 17:44:23 Dale wrote:
Hi,
I'm in the middle of a world update. I'm sort of doing it in parts
because of the device-mapper issue. Anyway, I keep getting the
@preserved-rebuild at the end of the emerge. I run it and it wants to
run it
On Tuesday 10 November 2009 20:50:35 Dale wrote:
Most likely avidemux and mplayer have hidden automagic dependencies on
x264 but they are not listed in DEPEND. So the packages need x264 but
portage doesn't know this.
Try unmerge the whole lot and re-merge everything. This should
Dale wrote:
Unmerging then emerging again fixed it. Is this a bug or just a one
time boo boo?
Dale
:-) :-)
Well, it's back. I'm going to call this unmasking creep. I had to
unmask and keyword some stuff until portage was happy to install the
updates.
I had to add the
Hi,
I recently did some upgrading which lead to some other packages having
to be rebuilt. I have one that can't build and hasn't been able to for
ages so I assume it isn't going to be fixed. It is hearts which is
pulled in my kde-meta. This rebuild also forced me to upgrade kbackup
which
On Sunday 11 October 2009 09:45:08 Dale wrote:
Hi,
I recently did some upgrading which lead to some other packages having
to be rebuilt. I have one that can't build and hasn't been able to for
ages so I assume it isn't going to be fixed. It is hearts which is
pulled in my kde-meta. This
On Saturday 26 September 2009, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 20:58:35 +0700, Robin Atwood wrote:
I had exactly the same problem. I solved it by deleting
/var/lib/portage/preserved_libs_registry with no ill effects (since
revdep- rebuild was clean).
No apparent ill effects. You
On Friday 25 September 2009, James wrote:
Hello,
I keep getting this mesaage on one particulary system:
existing preserved libs:
package: sys-libs/readline-6.0_p3
* - /lib64/libreadline.so
* - /lib64/libreadline.so.5
* - /lib64/libreadline.so.5.2
* used by
On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 20:58:35 +0700, Robin Atwood wrote:
I had exactly the same problem. I solved it by deleting
/var/lib/portage/preserved_libs_registry with no ill effects (since
revdep- rebuild was clean).
No apparent ill effects. You now have the old, orphaned version of the
library on
Hello,
I keep getting this mesaage on one particulary system:
existing preserved libs:
package: sys-libs/readline-6.0_p3
* - /lib64/libreadline.so
* - /lib64/libreadline.so.5
* - /lib64/libreadline.so.5.2
* used by /usr/bin/calgebra (kde-base/kalgebra-4.2.4)
So I've rebuilt
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 1:25 PM, James wirel...@tampabay.rr.com wrote:
Hello,
I keep getting this mesaage on one particulary system:
existing preserved libs:
package: sys-libs/readline-6.0_p3
* - /lib64/libreadline.so
* - /lib64/libreadline.so.5
* - /lib64/libreadline.so.5.2
*
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 1:25 PM, James wirel...@tampabay.rr.com wrote:
Hello,
I keep getting this mesaage on one particulary system:
existing preserved libs:
package: sys-libs/readline-6.0_p3
* - /lib64/libreadline.so
* - /lib64/libreadline.so.5
* - /lib64/libreadline.so.5.2
*
Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 1:25 PM, James wirel...@tampabay.rr.com wrote:
Hello,
I keep getting this mesaage on one particulary system:
existing preserved libs:
package: sys-libs/readline-6.0_p3
* - /lib64/libreadline.so
* - /lib64/libreadline.so.5
* -
69 matches
Mail list logo