[gentoo-user] Re: Introduce Manual manipulation during an emerge

2009-06-12 Thread Harry Putnam
Stroller writes: > But if you consider it a hassle, just mask the buggy version of > procmail & forget about the problem. Thanks... I thought of something like that but then noticed there's only one version available in portage. At that point I downloaded the previous version *21* tar ball and

[gentoo-user] Re: Introduce Manual manipulation during an emerge

2009-06-12 Thread Harry Putnam
Mike Kazantsev writes: > On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 14:59:53 -0500 > Harry Putnam wrote: > >> Isn't there a simple way to introduce the sed run in procmail sources >> during emerge? > > man 1 ebuild > ebuild /usr/portage/mail-filter/procmail configure > (do-some-sed-in-/var/tmp) > ebuild /usr/p

[gentoo-user] Re: Introduce Manual manipulation during an emerge

2009-06-12 Thread Harry Putnam
Mike Kazantsev writes: > man 1 ebuild > ebuild /usr/portage/mail-filter/procmail configure > (do-some-sed-in-/var/tmp) > ebuild /usr/portage/mail-filter/procmail merge Many thanks for the tips... and hugely usefull. But: Yikes I may have jumped the gun thinking I was good to go but at l

[gentoo-user] Re: Introduce Manual manipulation during an emerge

2009-06-12 Thread Harry Putnam
"Arttu V." writes: > On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 16:22 -0500, Harry Putnam wrote: > >> i486-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -O2 -march=i486 -pipe -fno-inline-functions2 >> -march=i486 -pipe -fno-inline-functions _autotst.c -o _autotst >> -Wl,-O1 cc1: error: unrecognized command line option >> "-fno-inline-functions2"

[gentoo-user] Re: Introduce Manual manipulation during an emerge

2009-06-13 Thread Harry Putnam
"Arttu V." writes: > Is there a reason to use i486 stage3? I think an i686 one might have > been available and a better hit if your system is/was set up as an i686 > before this? Well, not that it counts now, gotta go with what you have > unpacked. Looking at those stages again... it is not appa

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Introduce Manual manipulation during an emerge

2009-06-12 Thread Arttu V.
On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 16:22 -0500, Harry Putnam wrote: > i486-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -O2 -march=i486 -pipe -fno-inline-functions2 > -march=i486 -pipe -fno-inline-functions _autotst.c -o _autotst -Wl,-O1 > cc1: error: unrecognized command line option "-fno-inline-functions2" What do put in your CFLAGS

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Introduce Manual manipulation during an emerge

2009-06-12 Thread Arttu V.
On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 18:39 -0500, Harry Putnam wrote: > Here is what is in there right now.. apparently from the stage3 > pulled down during install a few days ago. > > CFLAGS="-O2 -march=i486 -pipe" > CXXFLAGS="-O2 -march=i486 -pipe" > CHOST="i486-pc-linux-gnu" Is there a reason to use i