Sigi Schwartz wrote:
So, how do I make new (testing-)settings apply without reboot?
/etc/init.d/net.eth0 restart
and wait a few seconds for your resolv.conf to be updated.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Hi.
Ryan Tandy wrote:
> the command should be: dnsdomainname (or hostname -d)
Now, I have a question to that: How or when do new settings apply? Even
though I use DHCP I understand that one can override the results from
that. For testing purposes I'd like to use that.
But I can change the setting
Mick wrote:
I saw this: # dns_domain_eth0="your.domain" in the /etc/conf.d/net.example and
added: dns_domain="STUDY"
but still .none comes up:
# domainname
(none)
the command should be: dnsdomainname (or hostname -d)
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On 9/17/06, Timothy A. Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am not sure if this is related or not, but for some reason, my
resolv.conf keeps getting modified, causing samba to fail. I open it
and all that is in there is the domain, no name servers.
The reason is noted in net.example:
# Setting
> > >> On Sun, 17 Sep 2006 07:50:28 +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> > >> > > It makes very little sense to ditch the unix norm of setting
a
> > >> > > systemwide domain name in favor of doing it per interface!
> > >> >
> > >> > True. And that's probably why you don't *have* to set it per
> > >> > i
On 9/17/06, Mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sunday 17 September 2006 13:43, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> · Mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On Sunday 17 September 2006 09:21, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> >> On Sun, 17 Sep 2006 07:50:28 +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> >> > > It makes very little sense to di
On Sunday 17 September 2006 13:43, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> · Mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On Sunday 17 September 2006 09:21, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> >> On Sun, 17 Sep 2006 07:50:28 +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> >> > > It makes very little sense to ditch the unix norm of setting a
> >> > > system
· Mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sunday 17 September 2006 09:21, Neil Bothwick wrote:
>> On Sun, 17 Sep 2006 07:50:28 +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote:
>> > > It makes very little sense to ditch the unix norm of setting a
>> > > systemwide domain name in favor of doing it per interface!
>> >
>> > True
· Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I have my system setup to disconnect the wireless NIC when a network
> cable is plugged in. Havingmore than one domain name at the same time is
> obviously a bad isdea, but where NICs are connected one at a time, there is
> certainly a use.
Allright, I see
9 matches
Mail list logo