On Monday 31 March 2008, Michael Schmarck wrote:
Stroller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 30 Mar 2008, at 06:47, Michael Schmarck wrote:
...
In your world, an aggressor is doing nothing wrong? Do I
understand that right?
...
Get real.
When you're describing someone who has annoyed you
On Monday 31 March 2008, Michael Schmarck wrote:
Stroller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 30 Mar 2008, at 06:47, Michael Schmarck wrote:
...
In your world, an aggressor is doing nothing wrong? Do I
understand that right?
...
Get real.
When you're describing someone who has annoyed you
darren kirby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
quoth the Michael Schmarck:
My attitude? Well, maybe. But I rather think it has everything
to do with Alan, who made a bad comment.
Have you not noticed that you are the _only_ person upset by Alan's post?
Yes, I have.
Why don't you think about
Stroller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 30 Mar 2008, at 06:47, Michael Schmarck wrote:
...
In your world, an aggressor is doing nothing wrong? Do I understand
that right?
...
Get real.
When you're describing someone who has annoyed you on the Internet as
an aggressor it probably means
On 28 Mar 2008, at 22:01, Hal Martin wrote:
Michael Schmarck wrote:
Alan McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now, onto your actual problem. It is exceptionally hard to even
attempt
to provide a solution unless someone else fixed the exact same
problem
before, as you have not provided any
Michael Schmarck wrote:
Alan McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now, onto your actual problem. It is exceptionally hard to even attempt
to provide a solution unless someone else fixed the exact same problem
before, as you have not provided any configuration at all and very
little useful
Alan McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now, onto your actual problem. It is exceptionally hard to even attempt
to provide a solution unless someone else fixed the exact same problem
before, as you have not provided any configuration at all and very
little useful information.
What would you
7 matches
Mail list logo
