· fire-eyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Over a whole system this can
> add up to a few dozen more MB of space usable.
This Depends largely on the "type" of files. I've got my portage
tree on a reiserfs, and in comparison to ext3, it saves couple
100 (one-zero-zero) megs!
Alexander Skwar
--
"Bond re
On Donnerstag, 26. April 2007, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> · fire-eyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Over a whole system this can
> > add up to a few dozen more MB of space usable.
>
> This Depends largely on the "type" of files. I've got my portage
> tree on a reiserfs, and in comparison to ext3, it saves
A bit softer than some of the other suggestions;
# eclean packages
# eclean distfiles
app-portage/gentoolkit contains eclean. From the man page;
"eclean is small tool to remove obsolete portage sources files and
binary packages. Used on a regular basis, it prevents your
DISTDIR and
> > Over a whole system this can
> > add up to a few dozen more MB of space usable.
>
> This Depends largely on the "type" of files. I've got my portage
> tree on a reiserfs, and in comparison to ext3, it saves couple
> 100 (one-zero-zero) megs!
OTOH, you may not need to switch to reiser for tha
On Sat, 28 Apr 2007 11:59:01 +0200, Ralf Stephan wrote:
> > This Depends largely on the "type" of files. I've got my portage
> > tree on a reiserfs, and in comparison to ext3, it saves couple
> > 100 (one-zero-zero) megs!
>
> OTOH, you may not need to switch to reiser for that.
> It may simply
Hemmann, Volker Armin írta:
> On Donnerstag, 26. April 2007, Alexander Skwar wrote:
>
>> · fire-eyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>>> Over a whole system this can
>>> add up to a few dozen more MB of space usable.
>>>
>> This Depends largely on the "type" of files. I've got my portage
>>
2007. 05. 3, csütörtök keltezéssel 22.17-kor Csányi András ezt írta:
> This is very big different.
> The filesystem space is problem for me. Use i reiserfs?
>
> Best regards,
> András
If I were you, yes.
I use reiserfs for years and I have good experiences with it (fault
tolerant, space efficien
On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 10:17:50PM +0200, Cs??nyi Andr??s wrote
Another thing you can do is use fewer partitions. Each partition
requires a safety margin. The fewer partitions you have, the less
wasted space for safety margins. Here is my setup...
[m450][waltdnes][~] df
Filesystem
On Friday 04 May 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I accomplish this by moving /tmp /usr and /var to the /home
> partition.
Surely you meant "move the /tmp, /usr and /var to the / partition"?
It won't work moving them to /home unless you put symlinks in and that
would just be ... odd
alan
--
On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 09:15:47AM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote
> On Friday 04 May 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I accomplish this by moving /tmp /usr and /var to the /home
> > partition.
>
> Surely you meant "move the /tmp, /usr and /var to the / partition"?
Let me rephrase myself...
- *P
On Saturday 05 May 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Surely you meant "move the /tmp, /usr and /var to the / partition"?
>
> Let me rephrase myself...
> - *PHYSICALLY* moving /tmp /usr and /var to the /home partition.
> - bind mount (or symlink) these directories to the / partition
OK, I se
11 matches
Mail list logo
