Am 26.05.2014 06:47, schrieb Nikos Chantziaras:
On 21/05/14 13:32, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
Do I still need these lines .. especially with a modern
systemd/gnome3-environment?
tmpfs /dev/shmtmpfs
nodev,nosuid,noexec 0 0
/dev/cdrw
On 21/05/14 13:32, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
Do I still need these lines .. especially with a modern
systemd/gnome3-environment?
tmpfs /dev/shmtmpfs
nodev,nosuid,noexec 0 0
/dev/cdrw /media/cdrecorder auto
user,exec,noauto,managed 0 0
You
On 12/17/2009 10:42 AM, Denis wrote:
Hello folks,
Quick question.
My main HD is SATA and gets /dev/sda in fstab. My CDROM, which is the
only device on the IDE bus, seems to be /dev/hda. That's what
Audacious declared when it was looking for a CD to play. I had CDROM
device forced to
On 12/17/2009 12:14 PM, Denis wrote:
The default udev scripts should have been able to automatically create
symlinks for optical devices in /dev. Whether yours is broken, you can
find out by trying to ls -l /dev/cdrom :)
It appears the links /dev/cdrom1 and /dev/cdrw1 are tied to /dev/hda.
Is
On 12/17/2009 08:42 PM, Denis wrote:
Hello folks,
Quick question.
My main HD is SATA and gets /dev/sda in fstab. My CDROM, which is the
only device on the IDE bus, seems to be /dev/hda. That's what
Audacious declared when it was looking for a CD to play. I had CDROM
device forced to
Colleen Beamer colleen.beamer at gmail.com writes:
The wrinkle is that my son bought me a usbstick. I can mount it just
fine. However, if my usb external hard drive is not powered on on boot,
the stick is recognized at sdc1. If the usb drive is powered on then,
the stick is recognized as
On 8/16/07, James [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Colleen Beamer colleen.beamer at gmail.com writes:
The wrinkle is that my son bought me a usbstick. I can mount it just
fine. However, if my usb external hard drive is not powered on on boot,
the stick is recognized at sdc1. If the usb drive
On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 18:07:59 -0600, Joseph wrote:
It makes me wander if anybody experiment with other file systems
(besides dos, ext2) on on memory sticks?
I put LVM on a memory stick recently, does that count?
--
Neil Bothwick
Beware of the opinion of someone without any facts.
Am Montag, 28. August 2006 10:30 schrieb ext Neil Bothwick:
On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 18:07:59 -0600, Joseph wrote:
It makes me wander if anybody experiment with other file systems
(besides dos, ext2) on on memory sticks?
I put LVM on a memory stick recently, does that count?
lvmfs? Never heard
On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 10:38:22 +0200, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
I put LVM on a memory stick recently, does that count?
lvmfs? Never heard of this ;-)
That's why I asked if it counted ;-)
--
Neil Bothwick
You are validating my inherent mistrust of strangers.
signature.asc
Description: PGP
On Mon, 2006-08-28 at 09:51 +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 10:38:22 +0200, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
I put LVM on a memory stick recently, does that count?
lvmfs? Never heard of this ;-)
That's why I asked if it counted ;-)
What is the result (disk space) in
On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 10:50:09 -0600, Joseph wrote:
lvmfs? Never heard of this ;-)
That's why I asked if it counted ;-)
What is the result (disk space) in comparison to vfat, ext2 etc.?
As Dirk pointed out, LVM is not a filesystem. If you want maximum
portability, FAT is the best
On Mon, 2006-08-28 at 19:01 +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote:
What is the result (disk space) in comparison to vfat, ext2 etc.?
As Dirk pointed out, LVM is not a filesystem. If you want maximum
portability, FAT is the best choice. If you want to cram as much as
possible on the device, either use
On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 13:26:22 -0600, Joseph wrote:
As Dirk pointed out, LVM is not a filesystem. If you want maximum
portability, FAT is the best choice. If you want to cram as much as
possible on the device, either use ReiserFS or get a larger device.
I just did a quick experiment with
On Sunday 27 August 2006 20:55, Joseph wrote:
Can someone refresh my memory?
I'm trying to mount usb memory stick with permission 600 but it is not
taking devmode=0600
The current command mounts it as 755
/dev/sda1 /mnt/camera auto
noauto,rw,users,exec
I've tried:
On Sunday 27 August 2006 23:59, Joseph wrote:
Harm Geerts is right (thanks) umask=0077 does what I need with dos
partition, when mounted, usb stick has a permission 700.
What would be an alternative for ext2 file system, umask doesn't work.
I might be wrong but I'm guessing you want different
On Mon, 2006-08-28 at 01:23 +0200, Harm Geerts wrote:
On Sunday 27 August 2006 23:59, Joseph wrote:
Harm Geerts is right (thanks) umask=0077 does what I need with dos
partition, when mounted, usb stick has a permission 700.
What would be an alternative for ext2 file system, umask doesn't
Keats neokeats at wanadoo.fr writes:
I have set my /etc/fstab following the instractions of the Handbook. In the
example there is this entry:
/dev/cdroms/cdrom0 /mnt/cdrom auto noauto,user0 0
you have to know the device of your cdrom
generaly it's a secondary
Le jeudi 23 mars 2006 à 21:08 +, James a écrit :
so I should make my /etc/fstab look like this?
/dev/hdc /mnt/?auto noauto,user0 0
/dev/hdd /mnt/cdromauto noauto,user0 0
mkdir /mnt/cdrom2
/dev/hdc /mnt/cdrom2auto noauto,user0 0
/dev/hdd /mnt/cdrom
On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 21:08:33 + (UTC), James wrote:
so I should make my /etc/fstab look like this?
/dev/hdc /mnt/?auto noauto,user0 0
/dev/hdd /mnt/cdromauto noauto,user0 0
I also have hal/ivman/dbus installed.
If you use ivman (or KDE's HAL-based media
20 matches
Mail list logo