Re: [gentoo-user] Re: gnome 2.26 stable?

2009-10-08 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
Stefan G. Weichinger schrieb: > Stefan G. Weichinger schrieb: > >> [...] >> >> thanks for the list ... after checking my backups I now added your list, >> edited a bit and started emerging. And now this: http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/desktop/gnome/howtos/gnome-2.26-upgrade.xml ;-) I will check

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: gnome 2.26 stable?

2009-10-01 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
Daniel Troeder schrieb: > ALSA is not a service (it's just drivers and API). There is nothing > running. It just loads your configuration (modules and volume levels). > PA on the other hand does not have hardware drivers - it relies on ALSA > or OSS for that. thanks, already activated it successf

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: gnome 2.26 stable?

2009-10-01 Thread Daniel Troeder
On Thu, 2009-10-01 at 15:08 +0200, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: > Daniel Troeder schrieb: > > On Thu, 2009-10-01 at 06:48 +0200, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: > >> Daniel Troeder schrieb: > >> Same here. After booting no sound ... in PA all looks good, after some > >> searching I find alsamixer mutes

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: gnome 2.26 stable?

2009-10-01 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
Daniel Troeder schrieb: > On Thu, 2009-10-01 at 06:48 +0200, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: >> Daniel Troeder schrieb: >> Same here. After booting no sound ... in PA all looks good, after some >> searching I find alsamixer mutes things ... sigh ... but as long as >> there aren't more problems I can li

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: gnome 2.26 stable?

2009-10-01 Thread Daniel Troeder
On Thu, 2009-10-01 at 06:48 +0200, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: > Daniel Troeder schrieb: > Same here. After booting no sound ... in PA all looks good, after some > searching I find alsamixer mutes things ... sigh ... but as long as > there aren't more problems I can live with it. You can set things

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: gnome 2.26 stable?

2009-09-30 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
Daniel Troeder schrieb: >> Thanks for sharing and encouraging! >> Stefan > > Happy to hear that :) > Yes... PA is a mess... it's really necessary and on the other hand it's > really a mess... there are lots of web sites out there that describe the > way. Still I'm having issues every other day, a

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: gnome 2.26 stable?

2009-09-30 Thread Daniel Troeder
On Wed, 2009-09-30 at 19:15 +0200, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: > Stefan G. Weichinger schrieb: > > > [...] > > > > thanks for the list ... after checking my backups I now added your list, > > edited a bit and started emerging. > > > > We'll see ;-) > > looks good so far, around 60 pkgs emerged,

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: gnome 2.26 stable?

2009-09-30 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
Stefan G. Weichinger schrieb: > [...] > > thanks for the list ... after checking my backups I now added your list, > edited a bit and started emerging. > > We'll see ;-) looks good so far, around 60 pkgs emerged, gnome 2.26 up and running. Now I look into the details, pulseaudio-integration and

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: gnome 2.26 stable?

2009-09-30 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
Daniel Troeder schrieb: >> Any way to share a meaningful list of gnome-related pkgs to >> unmask/keyword? Just for starting off here > > That's my list of GNOME related packages. Probably some of them are not > necessary to unmask anymore, and probably I missed some :) > > gnome-extra/nm-app

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: gnome 2.26 stable?

2009-09-30 Thread Daniel Troeder
> Any way to share a meaningful list of gnome-related pkgs to > unmask/keyword? Just for starting off here That's my list of GNOME related packages. Probably some of them are not necessary to unmask anymore, and probably I missed some :) gnome-extra/nm-applet net-misc/networkmanager-vpnc net

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: gnome 2.26 stable?

2009-09-30 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
Daniel Troeder schrieb: > I'm running testing GNOME on a "stable" system, with tesing > audio/video/gfx/xorg stuff. > Everything I consider "moving fast" is testing, the rest of the system > is stable. Works good for me. Just that I have to unmask more and more > base packages too, because they ar

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: gnome 2.26 stable?

2009-09-30 Thread Daniel Troeder
On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 18:19 -0700, walt wrote: > I run gnome on my ~amd64 machine and have had no problems at all (so far). > IMHO it's safe to run gnome on an ~amd64 machine, but I've not used the > unstable gnome desktop on a stable amd64 machine. Just from past experience > I might expect probl

[gentoo-user] Re: gnome 2.26 stable?

2009-09-29 Thread walt
On 09/29/2009 03:01 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: Without any ranting ... I feel kind of stupid waiting for GNOME 2.26 going stable within the gentoo-tree while GNOME 2.28 is out now at gnome.org. Maybe I am too conservative here and could already use 2.26 for a while by unmasking lots of pac