Bo Andresen wrote:
> On Friday 17 March 2006 19:24, Alexander Skwar wrote:
>> Is anyone using CDB with Portage 2.1?
>
> # grep ewarn /usr/portage/sys-apps/portage/portage-2.1_pre6-r3.ebuild
> ewarn "This series contains a completely rewritten caching framework."
> ewarn "If you a
On Saturday 18 March 2006 07:16, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> Yes, I know, but please read the thread.
Oh sorry. I probably shouldn't write to a mailing list when that tired... ;)
--
Bo Andresen
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Hi!
Hemmann, Volker Armin tu-clausthal.de> writes:
> http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-261580.html
>
> is the thread.
>
> But beware, in /usr/portage/modules you need this:
>
> portdbapi.auxdbmodule = cache.cdb.database
> eclass_cache.dbmodule = cache.cdb.database
>
> not that:
>
> portd
On Friday 17 March 2006 19:24, Alexander Skwar wrote:
>
> Is anyone using CDB with Portage 2.1?
with the latest portage incarnations it does not work anymore at all. But
portage got a lot speedier too, so the problem is not soo big.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On Friday 17 March 2006 19:24, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> Is anyone using CDB with Portage 2.1?
# grep ewarn /usr/portage/sys-apps/portage/portage-2.1_pre6-r3.ebuild
ewarn "This series contains a completely rewritten caching framework."
ewarn "If you are using any cache modules (su
5 matches
Mail list logo