Re: [gentoo-user] cdb with portage 2.1

2006-03-17 Thread Alexander Skwar
Bo Andresen wrote: > On Friday 17 March 2006 19:24, Alexander Skwar wrote: >> Is anyone using CDB with Portage 2.1? > > # grep ewarn /usr/portage/sys-apps/portage/portage-2.1_pre6-r3.ebuild > ewarn "This series contains a completely rewritten caching framework." > ewarn "If you a

Re: [gentoo-user] cdb with portage 2.1

2006-03-17 Thread Bo Andresen
On Saturday 18 March 2006 07:16, Alexander Skwar wrote: > Yes, I know, but please read the thread. Oh sorry. I probably shouldn't write to a mailing list when that tired... ;) -- Bo Andresen -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-user] cdb with portage 2.1 (was: CVSup vs Gentoo's Rsync)

2006-03-17 Thread Alexander Skwar
Hi! Hemmann, Volker Armin tu-clausthal.de> writes: > http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-261580.html > > is the thread. > > But beware, in /usr/portage/modules you need this: > > portdbapi.auxdbmodule = cache.cdb.database > eclass_cache.dbmodule = cache.cdb.database > > not that: > > portd

Re: [gentoo-user] cdb with portage 2.1 (was: CVSup vs Gentoo's Rsync)

2006-03-17 Thread Hemmann, Volker Armin
On Friday 17 March 2006 19:24, Alexander Skwar wrote: > > Is anyone using CDB with Portage 2.1? with the latest portage incarnations it does not work anymore at all. But portage got a lot speedier too, so the problem is not soo big. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] cdb with portage 2.1 (was: CVSup vs Gentoo's Rsync)

2006-03-17 Thread Bo Andresen
On Friday 17 March 2006 19:24, Alexander Skwar wrote: > Is anyone using CDB with Portage 2.1? # grep ewarn /usr/portage/sys-apps/portage/portage-2.1_pre6-r3.ebuild ewarn "This series contains a completely rewritten caching framework." ewarn "If you are using any cache modules (su