On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 22:47:45 +0300, Grant Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
All of my gentoo systems have both gcc 3.4 and 4.1 but still
use 3.4 for everything except packages that just won't build
with gcc 3.4.
I'm curious what other people are doing. Have most people
switched over to 4.1 as
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 02:13:44PM -0600, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> I believe there's still at least one package that doesn't build with gcc
> 4.x (kqemu), so there's some reason to still stay on 3.4 if you are
> cautious.
>
You mean qemu-softmmu. kqemu has almost always been compilable by
Grant,
On 15/02/07, Grant Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
All of my gentoo systems have both gcc 3.4 and 4.1 but still
use 3.4 for everything except packages that just won't build
with gcc 3.4.
I'm curious what other people are doing. Have most people
switched over to 4.1 as their "main" co
On Wednesday 14 February 2007 20:47:45 Grant Edwards wrote:
> I'm curious what other people are doing. Have most people
> switched over to 4.1 as their "main" compiler?
I did that last May. And not just main but only C compiler (No I don't use
qemu). ;)
--
Bo Andresen
pgpbOl2fmdwY7.pgp
Descr
On Wednesday 14 February 2007, Grant Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
about '[gentoo-user] gcc 3.4.6 vs. 4.1.1':
> All of my gentoo systems have both gcc 3.4 and 4.1 but still
> use 3.4 for everything except packages that just won't build
> with gcc 3.4.
>
&g
I did that while 4.1.1 was still unstable :-P
-Kristian Poul Herkild
-Original Message-
From: Grant Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 19:47:45 + (UTC)
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-user] gcc 3.4.6 vs. 4.1.1
>All of my gentoo systems
All of my gentoo systems have both gcc 3.4 and 4.1 but still
use 3.4 for everything except packages that just won't build
with gcc 3.4.
I'm curious what other people are doing. Have most people
switched over to 4.1 as their "main" compiler?
--
Grant Edwards grante
7 matches
Mail list logo
