Hi, Gentoo.
A friend of mine recently suggested I should install and play with
virtual machines on my Gentoo.
I've scanned /usr/portage for likely looking packages, particularly in
directory "virtual", yet found nothing likely looking.
Would somebody please give me some hints which packages I sh
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 11:20 AM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> Hi, Gentoo.
>
> A friend of mine recently suggested I should install and play with
> virtual machines on my Gentoo.
>
> I've scanned /usr/portage for likely looking packages, particularly in
> directory "virtual", yet found nothing likely l
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> Hi, Gentoo.
>
> A friend of mine recently suggested I should install and play with
> virtual machines on my Gentoo.
>
> I've scanned /usr/portage for likely looking packages, particularly in
> directory "virtual", yet found nothing likely lo
Hi Alan,
Am 22.11.2011 20:20, schrieb Alan Mackenzie:
> Hi, Gentoo.
>
> A friend of mine recently suggested I should install and play with
> virtual machines on my Gentoo.
>
> I've scanned /usr/portage for likely looking packages, particularly in
> directory "virtual", yet found nothing likely loo
On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 14:43:10 -0500
Michael Mol wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> > Hi, Gentoo.
> >
> > A friend of mine recently suggested I should install and play with
> > virtual machines on my Gentoo.
> >
> > I've scanned /usr/portage for likely looking packag
On Tue, 2011-11-22 at 19:20 +, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> Hi, Gentoo.
>
> A friend of mine recently suggested I should install and play with
> virtual machines on my Gentoo.
>
> I've scanned /usr/portage for likely looking packages, particularly in
> directory "virtual", yet found nothing likely
On 11/22/2011 11:20 AM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
Hi, Gentoo.
A friend of mine recently suggested I should install and play with
virtual machines on my Gentoo.
I've scanned /usr/portage for likely looking packages, particularly in
directory "virtual", yet found nothing likely looking.
Would somebo
On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 21:14:15 +0100
Felix Kuperjans wrote:
> > Would somebody please give me some hints which packages I should be
> > looking at, and perhaps any use flags I might need.
> VirtualBox is quite easy for beginners, but requires external kernel
> modules and requires a GUI (what you
Good evening, Felix!
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 09:14:15PM +0100, Felix Kuperjans wrote:
> Hi Alan,
> Am 22.11.2011 20:20, schrieb Alan Mackenzie:
> > Hi, Gentoo.
> > A friend of mine recently suggested I should install and play with
> > virtual machines on my Gentoo.
> > I've scanned /usr/portage
On Tue, 2011-11-22 at 14:43 -0500, Michael Mol wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> > Hi, Gentoo.
> >
> > A friend of mine recently suggested I should install and play with
> > virtual machines on my Gentoo.
> >
> > I've scanned /usr/portage for likely looking packages
On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 22:29:23 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> What I like about VBox is that you get all the useful bits in the
> open-source version.
Except USB support.
--
Neil Bothwick
What do you get if you cross an agnostic, an insomniac and adyslexic?
Someone who lies awake at night wonder
Am 22.11.2011 23:12, schrieb Alan Mackenzie:
> Good evening, Felix!
Good evening, Alan!
>
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 09:14:15PM +0100, Felix Kuperjans wrote:
>> Hi Alan,
>> Am 22.11.2011 20:20, schrieb Alan Mackenzie:
>>> Hi, Gentoo.
>>> A friend of mine recently suggested I should install and play
On Wed, November 23, 2011 12:06 am, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 22:29:23 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
>> What I like about VBox is that you get all the useful bits in the
>> open-source version.
>
> Except USB support.
Huh?
I used VirtualBox with a MSWindowsXP guest to use a "nega
On Tue, November 22, 2011 11:47 pm, William Kenworthy wrote:
> YMMV ... VB is stable and rarely if ever breaks, app and modules "just
> work" - performance is as good as vmware
I actually found VB to have better performance.
When using virtual machines, I tend to run multiple simultaneously.
V
On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 13:57:31 +0100, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> >> What I like about VBox is that you get all the useful bits in the
> >> open-source version.
> >
> > Except USB support.
>
> Huh?
>
> I used VirtualBox with a MSWindowsXP guest to use a "negatives" scanner
> that would refuse to wor
Am Wed, 23 Nov 2011 13:34:45 +
schrieb Neil Bothwick :
> On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 13:57:31 +0100, J. Roeleveld wrote:
>
> > >> What I like about VBox is that you get all the useful bits in the
> > >> open-source version.
> > >
> > > Except USB support.
> >
> > Huh?
> >
> > I used VirtualBox
On Wed, November 23, 2011 2:34 pm, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 13:57:31 +0100, J. Roeleveld wrote:
>
>> >> What I like about VBox is that you get all the useful bits in the
>> >> open-source version.
>> >
>> > Except USB support.
>>
>> Huh?
>>
>> I used VirtualBox with a MSWindowsXP
On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 14:01:34 +0100
"J. Roeleveld" wrote:
> On Tue, November 22, 2011 11:47 pm, William Kenworthy wrote:
>
>
>
> > YMMV ... VB is stable and rarely if ever breaks, app and modules
> > "just work" - performance is as good as vmware
>
> I actually found VB to have better performa
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 10:12 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> I notice this entire thread has carefully steered around ESXi
>
> Now there's an interesting product, with a truly fascinating licensing
> and pricing model.
ESXi isn't Linux. Or, at least, it's not something you'd run on your desktop.
But
On Nov 23, 2011 10:32 PM, "Michael Mol" wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 10:12 AM, Alan McKinnon
wrote:
> > I notice this entire thread has carefully steered around ESXi
> >
> > Now there's an interesting product, with a truly fascinating licensing
> > and pricing model.
>
> ESXi isn't Linux. O
20 matches
Mail list logo
