Greets, I recently bought a new CPU for my mythtv-box, it's a Pentium
Dual E2160
Currently I use
CFLAGS="-O2 -march=pentium4 -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer"
as I moved the system over from a Pentium 4 (which just crashed).
Things work fine so far, I checked google and
http://gentoo-wiki.com/S
On Nov 10, 2007 12:19 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Greets, I recently bought a new CPU for my mythtv-box, it's a Pentium
> Dual E2160
>
> Currently I use
>
> CFLAGS="-O2 -march=pentium4 -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer"
>
> as I moved the system over from a Pentium 4 (whic
On Saturday 10 Nov 2007 00:30 in article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
of linux.gentoo.user, Stefan G. Weichinger([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Greets, I recently bought a new CPU for my mythtv-box, it's a Pentium
> Dual E2160
>
> Currently I use
>
> CFLAGS="-O2 -march=pentium4 -pipe -fomit-frame-point
David W Noon schrieb:
> You need to consider CHOST as well, to ensure you make the most of the
> newer CPUs.
>
> Here is what I use on an E6600 machine:
>
> CHOST="x86_64-pc-linux-gnu"
> CFLAGS="-march=nocona -mmmx -m3dnow -msse -msse2 -msse3 -mfpmath=sse,387 -O2
> -pipe"
>
> Note that -fomit-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 10 Nov 2007 09:30 in article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
of linux.gentoo.user, Stefan G. Weichinger([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> David W Noon schrieb:
>
>> You need to consider CHOST as well, to ensure you make the most of
>> the newer CPUs.
>>
>
Am Samstag, 10. November 2007 schrieb David W Noon:
> If you change the CHOST, CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS variables, then do:
>emerge -e system
>emerge -e world
Since -e means "emptytree" (as in dependency tree), the latter would be
enough, right?
Bye...
Dirk
signature.asc
Descript
On Sat, Nov 10, 2007 at 02:18:46PM +, David W Noon wrote:
> If you change the CHOST, CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS variables, then do:
>emerge -e system
>emerge -e world
> you will have converted everything except your kernel to 64-bit.
Clearly you are completely clueless. Do *NOT* do this. It w
Bo Ørsted Andresen schrieb:
> On Sat, Nov 10, 2007 at 02:18:46PM +, David W Noon wrote:
>> If you change the CHOST, CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS variables, then do:
>>emerge -e system
>>emerge -e world
>> you will have converted everything except your kernel to 64-bit.
>
> Clearly you are compl
On Nov 10, 2007 2:18 PM, David W Noon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> If you change the CHOST, CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS variables, then do:
>emerge -e system
>emerge -e world
> you will have converted everything except your kernel to 64-bit. This
> was what you were planning anyway, but the chang
On Saturday 10 Nov 2007 19:20 in article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
of linux.gentoo.user, Bo Ørsted Andresen([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 10, 2007 at 02:18:46PM +, David W Noon wrote:
>> If you change the CHOST, CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS variables, then do:
>>emerge -e system
>>emerge -e
Stefan G. Weichinger schrieb:
> Maybe I will give it a try on another hdd and try to do a fresh install
> of x86_64 on that E2160, if the winter is long and boring ;-)
Additional question here:
Would I have to start with the amd64-live-cd when I want to install from
scratch, getting a 64-bit-sys
On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 23:16:37 +0100, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Would I have to start with the amd64-live-cd when I want to install from
> scratch, getting a 64-bit-system with the Core2Duo E6600?
Yes.
> I found some notes on the net "amd64 is for x86_64", unsure about
> that ...
That's righ
Neil Bothwick schrieb:
> On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 23:16:37 +0100, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>
>> Would I have to start with the amd64-live-cd when I want to install from
>> scratch, getting a 64-bit-system with the Core2Duo E6600?
>
> Yes.
>
>> I found some notes on the net "amd64 is for x86_64",
On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 23:34:40 +0100, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> >> I found some notes on the net "amd64 is for x86_64", unsure about
> >> that ...
> >
> > That's right, the architecture was originally for the AMD 64-bit
> > chips.
>
> Thanks for clearing that, not very intuitive :)
I
Neil Bothwick schrieb:
> On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 23:34:40 +0100, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>
I found some notes on the net "amd64 is for x86_64", unsure about
that ...
>>> That's right, the architecture was originally for the AMD 64-bit
>>> chips.
>> Thanks for clearing that, not very
15 matches
Mail list logo
