On Mon, 3 Apr 2006 20:01:17 -0500
Jerry McBride <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A follow up to my own request... the mentioned problem is fixed in
> 2.6.17-rc1. Hopefully it'll stay that way...
>
> Jerry
Did you get to test 2.6.17 yet? I was having similar problems when I
tried 2.6.16 with my AMD
On Monday 03 April 2006 18:18, Jerry McBride wrote:
> I depend on cpufreq to help stretch out the battery life of my laptop and
> it works quite well with 2.6.15.x kernels. However, upgrading to 2.6.16.x
> renders cpufreq dead in the water.
>
> The boot complaint is, the start up script says I need
I depend on cpufreq to help stretch out the battery life of my laptop and it
works quite well with 2.6.15.x kernels. However, upgrading to 2.6.16.x
renders cpufreq dead in the water.
The boot complaint is, the start up script says I need to configure the kernel
for cpufreq support even though
3 matches
Mail list logo