On Saturday 29 Oct 2016 12:56:46 Andrew Lowe wrote:
> Anyone seeing this again? I've just sync'd to two servers in Australia,
> and then, for the hell of it, one in Canada and am getting it for:
>
> dev-libs/botan
> app-arch/tar
> media-video/libav
> app-crypt/qca
> net-print/cups-filters
Here in Toronto at c 2016-10-08 20:30 EDT ,
I successfully emerged Bash Man-pages Cronbase ,
but ran into the digest problem with 7 'libX...' pkgs.
I've no idea which mirror it used for 'eix-sync',
but the source was probably downloaded from Waterloo Ont.
I'll simply leave them till next Sat, wh
On Saturday 08 Oct 2016 15:59:59 Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 1:03 PM, Håkon Alstadheim
>
> wrote:
> > Den 08. okt. 2016 11:24, skrev Bill Kenworthy:
> >> On 08/10/16 16:49, Mick wrote:
> >>> On Saturday 08 Oct 2016 11:45:05 Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 8, 2016
On 08/10/16 20:59, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 1:03 PM, Håkon Alstadheim
wrote:
Den 08. okt. 2016 11:24, skrev Bill Kenworthy:
On 08/10/16 16:49, Mick wrote:
On Saturday 08 Oct 2016 11:45:05 Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Andrew Lowe wrote:
On
On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 1:03 PM, Håkon Alstadheim
wrote:
> Den 08. okt. 2016 11:24, skrev Bill Kenworthy:
>> On 08/10/16 16:49, Mick wrote:
>>> On Saturday 08 Oct 2016 11:45:05 Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Andrew Lowe wrote:
> On 08/10/16 15:59, Alexander Kaps
Den 08. okt. 2016 11:24, skrev Bill Kenworthy:
> On 08/10/16 16:49, Mick wrote:
>> On Saturday 08 Oct 2016 11:45:05 Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
>>> On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Andrew Lowe wrote:
On 08/10/16 15:59, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
> I've been getting this output since last night
On 08/10/16 16:49, Mick wrote:
> On Saturday 08 Oct 2016 11:45:05 Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Andrew Lowe wrote:
>>> On 08/10/16 15:59, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
I've been getting this output since last night.
Calculating dependencies ... ... don
On Saturday 08 Oct 2016 11:45:05 Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Andrew Lowe wrote:
> > On 08/10/16 15:59, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
> >> I've been getting this output since last night.
> >>
> >> Calculating dependencies ... ... done!
> >> [ebuild U ] app-shel
On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Andrew Lowe wrote:
> On 08/10/16 15:59, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
>>
>> I've been getting this output since last night.
>>
>> Calculating dependencies ... ... done!
>> [ebuild U ] app-shells/bash-4.3_p48 [4.3_p46-r1]
>
> [snip]
> ...
> ...
> [snip]
>>
>> O
On 08/10/16 15:59, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
I've been getting this output since last night.
Calculating dependencies ... ... done!
[ebuild U ] app-shells/bash-4.3_p48 [4.3_p46-r1]
[snip]
...
...
[snip]
Or is there some other way to fix this, like running 'ebuild
/path/to/ebuild manif
I've been getting this output since last night.
Calculating dependencies ... ... done!
[ebuild U ] app-shells/bash-4.3_p48 [4.3_p46-r1]
[ebuild U ] x11-libs/libX11-1.6.4 [1.6.3]
[ebuild U ] x11-libs/libXrender-0.9.10 [0.9.9]
[ebuild U ] x11-libs/libXfixes-5.0.3 [5.0.2]
[eb
On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 06:52:20PM -0400, Valmor de Almeida wrote:
>Hello,
>I have done several
>emerge --sync
>today but the digest verification problem below does not go away.
>Any thoughts?
>Thank you.
This has been reported in Bug 579204 [0] and, as far as I am aware, w
Hello,
I have done several
emerge --sync
today but the digest verification problem below does not go away.
Any thoughts?
Thank you.
--
Valmor
>>> Fetching (165 of 221) media-libs/mesa-11.0.6::gentoo
!!! Digest verification failed:
!!! /usr/portage/media-libs/mesa/mesa-.ebuild
!!! Reason:
On Thursday 06 November 2008 19:14:57 de Almeida, Valmor F. wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Any inputs on what this problem might be? Any use of --searchdesc will
> result in a similar output.
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Valmor
>
> -> emerge --searchdesc eclipse
> Searching... \!!! Digest verification failed:
> !!!
Hello,
Any inputs on what this problem might be? Any use of --searchdesc will
result in a similar output.
Thanks,
--
Valmor
-> emerge --searchdesc eclipse
Searching... \!!! Digest verification failed:
!!! /usr/portage/app-backup/bacula/bacula-2.4.1-r1.ebuild
!!! Reason: Filesize does not matc
On Feb 19, 2008 7:25 AM, Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 07:08:41 -0500, Robert Stockdale IV wrote:
>
> > I't has been some time since I ran a
> > Gentoo based system and I'm hoping I don't do something to break it. I
> > hate reinstalling as I usually loose files an
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 07:08:41 -0500, Robert Stockdale IV wrote:
> I't has been some time since I ran a
> Gentoo based system and I'm hoping I don't do something to break it. I
> hate reinstalling as I usually loose files and time.
With the time it takes for a full reinstall and the amount of
docum
On Feb 17, 2008 7:15 PM, Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 09:57:13 -0500, Kenneth Prugh wrote:
>
> > I also don't think straight without breakfast, so I'm sorry about the
> > last email.. it wasn't very professional of me :>
>
> How does that differ from the rest of u
On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 09:57:13 -0500, Kenneth Prugh wrote:
> I also don't think straight without breakfast, so I'm sorry about the
> last email.. it wasn't very professional of me :>
How does that differ from the rest of us? :-)
> On a side note: the reason I hate -user is it completely breaks cla
On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 14:47:36 +
Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 09:32:25 -0500, Kenneth Prugh wrote:
>
> > yawn, and if the download was invalid it would most likely fail to
> > untar or something similar. I fail to see the point.
>
> That's because you are assu
On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 09:32:25 -0500, Kenneth Prugh wrote:
> yawn, and if the download was invalid it would most likely fail to
> untar or something similar. I fail to see the point.
That's because you are assuming that all file corruption is accidental,
whereas the manifest system is designed to p
On Sunday 17 February 2008, Kenneth Prugh wrote:
> > !!! Digest verification failed:
> > !!! /usr/portage/distfiles/firefox-2.0.0.11-source.tar.bz2
> > !!! Reason: Filesize does not match recorded size
> > !!! Got: 37480419
> > !!! Expected: 6794016
> >
> > Is there a problem with the digest? Is t
On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 14:25:11 +
Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 09:15:06 -0500, Kenneth Prugh wrote:
>
> > A temporary solution:
> >
> > cd /usr/portage/www-client/mozilla-firefox/ && rm Manifest && ebuild
> > mozilla-firefox-2.0.0.12.ebuild manifest
>
> s/temp
On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 09:15:06 -0500, Kenneth Prugh wrote:
> A temporary solution:
>
> cd /usr/portage/www-client/mozilla-firefox/ && rm Manifest && ebuild
> mozilla-firefox-2.0.0.12.ebuild manifest
s/temporary/terrible/
This message means that either the portage tree contains the wrong
checksum
On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 08:03:21 -0500
"Robert Stockdale IV" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have been trying to complete a
> glsa-check -f affected
> for the past 2 days.
> The latest problem I have encountered is:
>
> >>> Downloading '
> http://distfiles.gentoo.org/distfiles/firefox-2.0.0.11-source.
On Feb 17, 2008 8:07 AM, Alexander Meinke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Robert Stockdale IV wrote:
> | * checking firefox-2.0.0.11-source.tar.bz2 ;-)
> | ...
>
> | [ !! ]
> |
> | !!! Digest verification failed:
> | !!! /usr/portage/distfiles/fire
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Robert Stockdale IV wrote:
| * checking firefox-2.0.0.11-source.tar.bz2 ;-)
| ...
| [ !! ]
|
| !!! Digest verification failed:
| !!! /usr/portage/distfiles/firefox-2.0.0.11-source.tar.bz2
| !!! Reason: Filesize does not match recorded size
| !!! Got
I have been trying to complete a
glsa-check -f affected
for the past 2 days.
The latest problem I have encountered is:
>>> Downloading '
http://distfiles.gentoo.org/distfiles/firefox-2.0.0.11-source.tar.bz2'
--02:17:55--
http://distfiles.gentoo.org/distfiles/firefox-2.0.0.11-source.tar.bz2
On 19:54 Tue 20 Mar , Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
> On Tuesday 20 March 2007 19:28:26 Vikas Kumar wrote:
> > today after emerge --sync when i did emerge -pvuDN world, i got this
> >
> > # emerge -pvuDN world
> >
> > These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
> >
> > Calculating world
On Tuesday 20 March 2007 19:28:26 Vikas Kumar wrote:
> today after emerge --sync when i did emerge -pvuDN world, i got this
>
> # emerge -pvuDN world
>
> These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
>
> Calculating world dependencies \!!! Digest verification failed:
> !!! /usr/portage/gno
hello everyone,
today after emerge --sync when i did emerge -pvuDN world, i got this
# emerge -pvuDN world
These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
Calculating world dependencies \!!! Digest verification failed:
!!! /usr/portage/gnome-extra/libgsf/libgsf-1.14.0.ebuild
!!! Reason: F
From: "Stuart Howard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Digest verification failed:
qt-x11-opensource-src-4.1.4.tar.gz
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 11:55:50 +0100
Thanks a lot! qt is currently compiling! :)
Keep hacking!
mcc
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149809
Have a look at this, should help
On 25/10/06, Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 12:08:42 +0200, Régis Décamps wrote:
> So I'd say there is a problem in the ebuild. Maybe you should copy the
> ebuild in an overlay director
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 12:08:42 +0200, Régis Décamps wrote:
> So I'd say there is a problem in the ebuild. Maybe you should copy the
> ebuild in an overlay directory and regenerate it with
> ebuild qt-x11-opensource-src-4.1.4.ebuild digest
You don;t need to copy an ebuild to an overlay to re-digest
On 10/25/06, Meino Christian Cramer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I got this:
>>> Downloading
'ftp://sunsite.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/pub/Linux/gentoo/distfiles/qt-x11-opensource-src-4.1.4.tar.gz'
--06:23:28--
ftp://sunsite.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/pub/Linux/gentoo/distfiles/qt-x11
Hi,
I got this:
>>> Downloading
'ftp://sunsite.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/pub/Linux/gentoo/distfiles/qt-x11-opensource-src-4.1.4.tar.gz'
--06:23:28--
ftp://sunsite.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/pub/Linux/gentoo/distfiles/qt-x11-opensource-src-4.1.4.tar.gz
=> `/usr/portage/distf
On Sun, 1 Oct 2006 03:41:39 +0200
Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
...[snip]...
> Since the offending file is in the portage tree rather than in
> distfiles it doesn't make a lot of sense to delete it since only a
> sync will be able to refetch it anyway. Had it been in distfiles then
> Dales suggestion
On Sunday 01 October 2006 02:23, David Relson wrote:
> In the last few days I've been encountering lots of "Digest
> verification failed" messages indicating SHA256 verification
> problems (see below).
>
> Searching the web, I've found the "generate your own" digest solution,
> i.e. "ebuild ...pac
David Relson wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> In the last few days I've been encountering lots of "Digest
> verification failed" messages indicating SHA256 verification
> problems (see below).
>
> Searching the web, I've found the "generate your own" digest solution,
> i.e. "ebuild ...package...ebuild dige
Greetings,
In the last few days I've been encountering lots of "Digest
verification failed" messages indicating SHA256 verification
problems (see below).
Searching the web, I've found the "generate your own" digest solution,
i.e. "ebuild ...package...ebuild digest". Since the checksums are
pres
On Mon, 2005-10-03 at 14:29 -0400, Dave Nebinger wrote:
> > I can't figure out how to get past it.
>
> After changing the ebuild, type "ebuild mailman-xxx.ebuild digest". This
> fixes the digest values.
>
> You should then be able to emerge mailman w/o resync.
>
>
or type emerge --digest mail
> I can't figure out how to get past it.
After changing the ebuild, type "ebuild mailman-xxx.ebuild digest". This
fixes the digest values.
You should then be able to emerge mailman w/o resync.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
A long time ago I was having problems with mailman. I posted a question
to this list and someone told me that I would have to change the MAILGID
in the ebuild to whatever the gid of daemon was. Back then I did that
and re-emerged mailman and everything worked. Now I'm facing a similar
situation,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Daevid Vincent wrote:
> It seems lately (within the past few months), I am seeing a lot more of
> these:
>
> !!! Digest verification Failed:
> !!!/usr/portage/distfiles/foo-1.2.3.tar.gz
> !!! Reason: Failed on MD5 verification
>
This is probably
On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 10:48:10 -0700, Daevid Vincent wrote:
> I would use --skipfirst, but that doesn't work with "emerge -Davu
> world"... *sigh*.
--skipfirst only works in conjunction with --resume
emerge -avuD world
something fails
emerge --resume --skipfirst
--
Neil Bothwick
Another casual
> Anyone know why the digests are failing so frequently? Are they packaged
> poorly? Is it the mirror I'm getting them from? But then that begs the
> question, aren't the mirrors synchronized and MD5 verified with each
> other?
> Shouldn't TCP/IP be safe in that it retries a packet until it gets it
It seems lately (within the past few months), I am seeing a lot more of
these:
!!! Digest verification Failed:
!!!/usr/portage/distfiles/foo-1.2.3.tar.gz
!!! Reason: Failed on MD5 verification
The problem (aside from the obvious) is that portage just shits the bed and
doesn't try to re-get th
47 matches
Mail list logo
