On 24/09/2015 20:12, Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 25, 2015 7:58:44 PM Alan McKinnon wrote:
>> On 25/08/2015 19:43, Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
>>> On Tuesday, August 25, 2015 12:30:09 PM Alan McKinnon wrote:
On 25/08/2015 04:28, Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
> On Monday, August
On Tuesday, August 25, 2015 7:58:44 PM Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 25/08/2015 19:43, Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
> > On Tuesday, August 25, 2015 12:30:09 PM Alan McKinnon wrote:
> >> On 25/08/2015 04:28, Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
> >>> On Monday, August 24, 2015 9:31:38 PM Alan McKinnon wrote:
> D
On Tuesday, August 25, 2015 7:58:44 PM Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 25/08/2015 19:43, Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
> > On Tuesday, August 25, 2015 12:30:09 PM Alan McKinnon wrote:
> >> On 25/08/2015 04:28, Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
> >>> On Monday, August 24, 2015 9:31:38 PM Alan McKinnon wrote:
> D
On 25/08/2015 19:43, Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 25, 2015 12:30:09 PM Alan McKinnon wrote:
>> On 25/08/2015 04:28, Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
>>> On Monday, August 24, 2015 9:31:38 PM Alan McKinnon wrote:
Does anyone have an opinion to offer on bug 501468?
https://b
On Tuesday, August 25, 2015 12:30:09 PM Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 25/08/2015 04:28, Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
> > On Monday, August 24, 2015 9:31:38 PM Alan McKinnon wrote:
> >> Does anyone have an opinion to offer on bug 501468?
> >>
> >> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=501468
> >>
> >> It
On 25/08/2015 04:28, Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
> On Monday, August 24, 2015 9:31:38 PM Alan McKinnon wrote:
>> Does anyone have an opinion to offer on bug 501468?
>>
>> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=501468
>>
>> It's been annoying me for a week now with this message:
>>
>> !!! existing pr
On Monday, August 24, 2015 10:28:36 PM Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
> On Monday, August 24, 2015 9:31:38 PM Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > Does anyone have an opinion to offer on bug 501468?
> >
> > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=501468
> >
> > It's been annoying me for a week now with this messa
On Monday, August 24, 2015 9:31:38 PM Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Does anyone have an opinion to offer on bug 501468?
>
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=501468
>
> It's been annoying me for a week now with this message:
>
> !!! existing preserved libs:
> >>> package: www-client/firefox-40.0.
On Monday, August 24, 2015 8:58:56 PM Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
> On Monday, August 24, 2015 10:42:28 PM Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > On 24/08/2015 22:04, Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
> > > On Monday, August 24, 2015 9:31:38 PM Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > >> Does anyone have an opinion to offer on bug 501468
On Monday, August 24, 2015 10:42:28 PM Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 24/08/2015 22:04, Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
> > On Monday, August 24, 2015 9:31:38 PM Alan McKinnon wrote:
> >> Does anyone have an opinion to offer on bug 501468?
> >>
> >> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=501468
> >>
> >> It'
On 24/08/2015 22:04, Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
> On Monday, August 24, 2015 9:31:38 PM Alan McKinnon wrote:
>> Does anyone have an opinion to offer on bug 501468?
>>
>> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=501468
>>
>> It's been annoying me for a week now with this message:
>>
>> !!! existing pr
On Monday, August 24, 2015 9:31:38 PM Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Does anyone have an opinion to offer on bug 501468?
>
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=501468
>
> It's been annoying me for a week now with this message:
>
> !!! existing preserved libs:
> >>> package: www-client/firefox-40.0.
Does anyone have an opinion to offer on bug 501468?
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=501468
It's been annoying me for a week now with this message:
!!! existing preserved libs:
>>> package: www-client/firefox-40.0.2
* - /usr/lib64/firefox/libmozalloc.so
* used by /usr/lib64/thunde
13 matches
Mail list logo