Re: [gentoo-user] Fail2Ban vs SSHGuard? Comparison? What's the difference?

On 16/09/2017 23:25, Stroller wrote: > >> On 16 Sep 2017, at 20:31, Alan McKinnon wrote: >> >> As far as I'm aware (and could be wrong), sshguard is mostly just sshd >> whereas fail2ban works on anything you can give it consistent logs for. > > I thought otherwise, but

Re: [gentoo-user] Fail2Ban vs SSHGuard? Comparison? What's the difference?

> On 16 Sep 2017, at 20:31, Alan McKinnon wrote: > > As far as I'm aware (and could be wrong), sshguard is mostly just sshd > whereas fail2ban works on anything you can give it consistent logs for. I thought otherwise, but you appear to be right - SSHGuard appears to

Re: [gentoo-user] Fail2Ban vs SSHGuard? Comparison? What's the difference?

On 16/09/2017 16:06, Stroller wrote: > Is anyone familiar enough with this subject to make a comparison between > these two programs, please? > > If I google Fail2Ban vs SSHGuard I get many hits saying "I use this one", but > no-one saying why one might be better than the other. > > So far I'm

[gentoo-user] Fail2Ban vs SSHGuard? Comparison? What's the difference?

Is anyone familiar enough with this subject to make a comparison between these two programs, please? If I google Fail2Ban vs SSHGuard I get many hits saying "I use this one", but no-one saying why one might be better than the other. So far I'm favouring SSHGuard, but mostly because the website