On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 8:38 AM, David Relson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Sep 2008 12:58:40 -0400
> Kirk Lowery wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 2:47 AM, Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>> > On Thu, 25 Sep 2008 17:59:35 -0400, Kirk Lowery wrote:
>> >
>> >> During upgradin
On Sat, 27 Sep 2008 12:58:40 -0400
Kirk Lowery wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 2:47 AM, Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > On Thu, 25 Sep 2008 17:59:35 -0400, Kirk Lowery wrote:
> >
> >> During upgrading today, I inadvertently allowed 2.3 to be deleted.
> >> I looked in portage, but i
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 2:47 AM, Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Sep 2008 17:59:35 -0400, Kirk Lowery wrote:
>
>> During upgrading today, I inadvertently allowed 2.3 to be deleted. I
>> looked in portage, but it is apparently gone.
>
> Nothing is ever truly gone from portage
>
On Thu, 25 Sep 2008 17:59:35 -0400, Kirk Lowery wrote:
> During upgrading today, I inadvertently allowed 2.3 to be deleted. I
> looked in portage, but it is apparently gone.
Nothing is ever truly gone from portage
http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/dev-lang/python/?hideattic=0
goes
Kirk Lowery schrieb:
I'm maintaining some legacy software (don't ask ;-) that won't work on
python-2.4, but needs 2.3.
During upgrading today, I inadvertently allowed 2.3 to be deleted. I
looked in portage, but it is apparently gone.
Any suggestions on finding the old ebuild so that I can slot
I'm maintaining some legacy software (don't ask ;-) that won't work on
python-2.4, but needs 2.3.
During upgrading today, I inadvertently allowed 2.3 to be deleted. I
looked in portage, but it is apparently gone.
Any suggestions on finding the old ebuild so that I can slot it in?
TIA!
Kirk
6 matches
Mail list logo