On Mon, 02 May 2005 15:27:14 -0400, Robert G. Hays wrote:
> And JIC you need this, parts 1 through 4 are the primaries, 5 and up
> *will* be logicals, *if* one of 1 through 4 was designated as an
> extended partition. Only one primary per disk can be extended.
Linux doesn't require any partiti
On Sunday 01 May 2005 03:06 pm, Maxim Vexler wrote:
> oops, sorry my mistake.
> windows (fat32) is on hda6.
> hda5 is ext3 which is mapped as /home.
>
> The grub syntax is correct, sorry for the confusion.
>
I tried that setup once and never could get it working on an extended
partition.
--
Ch
And JIC you need this, parts 1 through 4 are the primaries, 5 and up
*will* be logicals, *if* one of 1 through 4 was designated as an
extended partition. Only one primary per disk can be extended.
jic!,
rgh.
The Disguised Jedi wrote:
Windows REFUSES to be installed on a logical partition. It p
Windows REFUSES to be installed on a logical partition. It prefers to be in the #1 slot, but will take as low as #4. Anything else is no good for it.
Move it to hda1 and you shouldn't have any problems with it.
On 5/2/05, Maxim Vexler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/2/05, Richard Fish <[EMAIL
On 5/2/05, Richard Fish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maxim Vexler wrote:
>
> >I think that the claim of "Windows unable to boot from logical
> >partition" is half true.
> >As I have written, I did managed to install and boot windows from a
> >logical partition but the windows boot loader (ntldr) h
Maxim Vexler wrote:
>I think that the claim of "Windows unable to boot from logical
>partition" is half true.
>As I have written, I did managed to install and boot windows from a
>logical partition but the windows boot loader (ntldr) had to be on a
>physical partition.
>
>That leades me to this id
On 5/1/05, Travis Rousseau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The system (windows) itself got installed into hda5.
>
> then
>
> rootnoverify (hd0,5)
> makeactive
> chainloader +1
>
> Should look like
>
> rootnoverify (hd0,4)
> makeactive
> chainloader +1
>
> Travis R.
>
> --
oops, sorry my mista
> The system (windows) itself got installed into hda5.
then
rootnoverify (hd0,5)
makeactive
chainloader +1
Should look like
rootnoverify (hd0,4)
makeactive
chainloader +1
Travis R.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On 5/1/05, Richard Fish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maxim Vexler wrote:
>
> >Hello to everyone,
> >
> >I'm trying to achieve the most simple dual boot possible : Linux &
> >Windows on the same hd.
> >Trivial? I Think not!
> >
> >Here is my new 160GB hard drive scheme, after being dd if=/dev/zero
Maxim Vexler wrote:
>Hello to everyone,
>
>I'm trying to achieve the most simple dual boot possible : Linux &
>Windows on the same hd.
>Trivial? I Think not!
>
>Here is my new 160GB hard drive scheme, after being dd if=/dev/zero bs=512 out.
>hda1 ext2
>hda2 swap
>hda3 reiserfs
>hda4 extended
>
Hello to everyone,
I'm trying to achieve the most simple dual boot possible : Linux &
Windows on the same hd.
Trivial? I Think not!
Here is my new 160GB hard drive scheme, after being dd if=/dev/zero bs=512 out.
hda1 ext2
hda2 swap
hda3 reiserfs
hda4 extended
hda5 ext3
hda6 fat32
hda7 Linu
11 matches
Mail list logo
