On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 09:16:58AM +0100, Florian Philipp wrote:
> >>> * The last thing I’m going to set up is filesystem encryption, at least
> >>> for ~.
> >>> I already know/think that AES would be the best choice due to limited
> >>> CPU
> >>> power, but what else is there to heed beside
Am Mittwoch, 12. Dezember 2012, 02:40:04 schrieb Frank Steinmetzger:
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 09:20:55PM +0100, Florian Philipp wrote:
> > > * From my observations, the benefit of 64 bit over 32 is much smaller
> > > for an> >
> > > Atom than it is for my Core2. Am I right to assume thus that
On Wed, 12 Dec 2012 18:41:03 +0100, Florian Philipp wrote:
> >> I personally see no reason for encrypting root as there is nothing of
> >> interest in there.
> >
> > No passwords in /etc? The main reason I encrypt / is that wicd keeps
> > its passwords in /etc.
> >
>
> I substitute with syml
Am 12.12.2012 10:40, schrieb Neil Bothwick:
> On Wed, 12 Dec 2012 09:16:58 +0100, Florian Philipp wrote:
>
>> I personally see no reason for encrypting root as there is nothing of
>> interest in there.
>
> No passwords in /etc? The main reason I encrypt / is that wicd keeps its
> passwords in /et
On Wed, 12 Dec 2012 09:16:58 +0100, Florian Philipp wrote:
> I personally see no reason for encrypting root as there is nothing of
> interest in there.
No passwords in /etc? The main reason I encrypt / is that wicd keeps its
passwords in /etc.
--
Neil Bothwick
DOS never says "EXCELLENT comman
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 06:36:47PM +0100, Frank Steinmetzger wrote
> * I???m interested in the question of -O2 vs. -Os.
> Some sources say -Os is bad, b/c it breaks debugging and is mainly
> untested. I won???t do heavy developing on it anyway, and Atoms do
> have a puny cache. So I wonder
Am 12.12.2012 02:40, schrieb Frank Steinmetzger:
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 09:20:55PM +0100, Florian Philipp wrote:
>
>>> * From my observations, the benefit of 64 bit over 32 is much smaller for an
>>> Atom than it is for my Core2. Am I right to assume thus that the Atom
>>> architecture doe
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 09:20:55PM +0100, Florian Philipp wrote:
> > * From my observations, the benefit of 64 bit over 32 is much smaller for an
> > Atom than it is for my Core2. Am I right to assume thus that the Atom
> > architecture doesn’t have much to offer to 64 bit (such as extra
> >
I have: Atom(TM) CPU 330 @ 1.60GHz
running it with:
CFLAGS="-march=core2 -O2 -pipe"
CXXFLAGS="${CFLAGS}"
MAKEOPTS="-j5"
CHOST="x86_64-pc-linux-gnu"
Didn't run any test performance on it, but the only disappointing fact about
this small box is that it will not reboot itself when the power goe
Am 11.12.2012 18:36, schrieb Frank Steinmetzger:
> Hello list
>
> Long time no read... :)
>
> It follows a verbose preamble. For the actual questions see dashed line
> below.
> TL;DR summary: it’s all about ricer-performance questions on a netbook.
>
>
> I have the luck of having obtained a u
On 11 December 2012 12:36, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> Hello list
. . .
> So I’m interested in you opinion and own experience about the following
> arising questions:
>
> * From my observations, the benefit of 64 bit over 32 is much smaller for an
> Atom than it is for my Core2. Am I right to a
Hello list
Long time no read... :)
It follows a verbose preamble. For the actual questions see dashed line below.
TL;DR summary: it’s all about ricer-performance questions on a netbook.
I have the luck of having obtained a used netbook for free (Atom N450, single-
core with HT, 1 GB memory, 54
12 matches
Mail list logo
