Am Mittwoch, 8. Oktober 2008 23:28:50 schrieb b.n.:
> I know that *in theory* it is so. In practice however, someone in this
> thread has said that for example kopete suffers incompatibilities.
Hmm, kopete _is_ part of KDE and _has_been ported (both is not true for k3b,
AFAIK). However, if there
Alan McKinnon ha scritto:
> On Wednesday 08 October 2008 19:40:25 b.n. wrote:
>> Erik Hahn ha scritto:
>>> On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 11:13:33PM +0400, Andrew Gaydenko wrote:
I have found another KDE app which is important sufficiently to delay
switching to KDE4 - the app is k3b, which still
On Wednesday 08 October 2008 19:40:25 b.n. wrote:
> Erik Hahn ha scritto:
> > On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 11:13:33PM +0400, Andrew Gaydenko wrote:
> >> I have found another KDE app which is important sufficiently to delay
> >> switching to KDE4 - the app is k3b, which still isn't ported. If I
> >> unde
Am Mittwoch, 8. Oktober 2008 19:40:25 schrieb b.n.:
> Does k3b 3.5 run happily under kde4?
As happily as under fvwm, or gnustep, or xfce, or...
It doesn't matter on which desktop it runs as long as it finds its libs.
Oh, btw. the last version 1.0.5, not 3.5.
Bye...
Dirk
Erik Hahn ha scritto:
> On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 11:13:33PM +0400, Andrew Gaydenko wrote:
>> I have found another KDE app which is important sufficiently to delay
>> switching to KDE4 - the app is k3b, which still isn't ported. If I
>> understand well, there isn't any minimal apps list (and k3b, w
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 2:13 PM, Andrew Gaydenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have found another KDE app which is important sufficiently to delay
> switching to KDE4 - the app is k3b, which still isn't ported. If I
> understand well, there isn't any minimal apps list (and k3b, would be in
> the li
On Tuesday 07 October 2008 16:14:12 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> [...] you haven't given a category/package-version, just the package
> name. I did the same because it's been a while since I used this.
>
> autounmask kde-base/kde-meta-4.1.2
Of course. Thanks.
--
Rgds
Peter
=== On Wednesday 08 October 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote: ===
> On Tuesday 07 October 2008 21:56:58 Erik Hahn wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 11:13:33PM +0400, Andrew Gaydenko wrote:
> > > I have found another KDE app which is important sufficiently to delay
> > > switching to KDE4 - the ap
On Tuesday 07 October 2008 21:56:58 Erik Hahn wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 11:13:33PM +0400, Andrew Gaydenko wrote:
> > I have found another KDE app which is important sufficiently to delay
> > switching to KDE4 - the app is k3b, which still isn't ported. If I
> > understand well, there isn't a
=== On Tuesday 07 October 2008, Erik Hahn wrote: ===
> On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 11:13:33PM +0400, Andrew Gaydenko wrote:
> > I have found another KDE app which is important sufficiently to delay
> > switching to KDE4 - the app is k3b, which still isn't ported. If I
> > understand well, there
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 11:13:33PM +0400, Andrew Gaydenko wrote:
> I have found another KDE app which is important sufficiently to delay
> switching to KDE4 - the app is k3b, which still isn't ported. If I
> understand well, there isn't any minimal apps list (and k3b, would be in
> the list, I t
=== On Tuesday 07 October 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ===
> > === On Tuesday 07 October 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > === ..
> >
> > > KDE-4.1.2 is running good, too.
> >
> > BTW, have Gentoo KDE maintainers any plans/politics wrt KDE4 unmasking
> > for ~archs? 4.2?
>
> in p
> === On Tuesday 07 October 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ===
> ..
>
> > KDE-4.1.2 is running good, too.
>
> BTW, have Gentoo KDE maintainers any plans/politics wrt KDE4 unmasking for
> ~archs? 4.2?
in package.mask is wrote:
# KDE 4.1.2 ebuilds from the kde overlay are going to enter the
On Tue, 7 Oct 2008 08:44:46 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > emerge autounmask
> > autounmask kde-meta
>
> When I tried that just now I got this (blank lines pruned):
>
> # autounmask kde-meta
> autounmask version 0.21 (using PortageXS-0.02.07 and portage-2.2_rc11)
> * Using repositories:
>
On Sunday 05 October 2008 19:16:55 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> emerge autounmask
> autounmask kde-meta
When I tried that just now I got this (blank lines pruned):
# autounmask kde-meta
autounmask version 0.21 (using PortageXS-0.02.07 and portage-2.2_rc11)
* Using repositories:
/usr/portage
=== On Tuesday 07 October 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ===
..
> KDE-4.1.2 is running good, too.
BTW, have Gentoo KDE maintainers any plans/politics wrt KDE4 unmasking for
~archs? 4.2?
> Well, I took notice that kde 4.1.2 is in portage... I quickly removed
> kde-svn and layman and began the unmasking and keywording of 4.1.2. I let
> it all install over night and... This morning, with a little trepidation,
> I booted into KDE-4.1.2... no problems!
>
> This is the first of the re
On Tue, 07 Oct 2008 00:01:03 +0200, b.n. wrote:
> (Also, I don't want ~x86 portage)
Why not? It's running well on several machines here, some are fully ~arch
while others run mainly stable with a handful of testing packages,
including portage.
Or you could use paludis, that way you can install K
Jerry McBride ha scritto:
I have both kde-3.5.10 and kde-4.1.2 and there are a couple of small
incompatibilities... and that's why they are still masked. If I recall
right... I had to upgrade to the latest ~x86 portage and then I had to iron
out kopete for both versions of kde... No show stopp
On Monday 06 October 2008 04:07:27 pm b.n. wrote:
> Roy Wright ha scritto:
> > Neil Bothwick wrote:
> >> On Sun, 05 Oct 2008 20:08:23 +0200, b.n. wrote:
> >>> Could you share your relevant package.mask and package.keywords, for
> >>> the laziest of us? :)
> >>
> >> emerge autounmask
> >> autounmask
Roy Wright ha scritto:
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sun, 05 Oct 2008 20:08:23 +0200, b.n. wrote:
Could you share your relevant package.mask and package.keywords, for
the laziest of us? :)
emerge autounmask
autounmask kde-meta
On my ~x86, I had to add:
~app-misc/strigi-0.5.11
to etc/portage/pac
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sun, 05 Oct 2008 20:08:23 +0200, b.n. wrote:
>
>> Could you share your relevant package.mask and package.keywords, for
>> the laziest of us? :)
>
> emerge autounmask
> autounmask kde-meta
On my ~x86, I had to add:
~app-misc/strigi-0.5.11
to etc/portage/package.unmask/
On Sun, 05 Oct 2008 17:30:40 -0500, Dale wrote:
> > I used it the last time I tried KDE4 and it did just as was expected,
> > except is added =cat/pkg-vers, which I changed to ~cat/pkg/vers so I
> > could pick up and fixes.
> You can tell it not to put versions tho.
Yes, but that can be dodgy. I
It turns out that /etc/portage/package.keywords
and /etc/portage/package.unmask can be directories, which is convenient
for organizational purposes. If this is the case, autounmask does the
smart thing and creates the file autounmask-pkgname (in this case,
autounmask-kde-meta) in those folders. I
Neil Bothwick wrote:
>
> It basically adds a bunch of packages to /etc/portage/packages.unmask
> and /etc/portage/packages.keywords, bracketed by start/end comments so
> you can remove them. It's a quick and easy way of emerging something
> with a lot of masked dependencies, like kde-meta:4.
>
> I
On Sun, 5 Oct 2008 22:47:42 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > emerge autounmask
> > autounmask kde-meta
>
> For the super-lazy amongst us, what does that package do?
>
> OK, I can figure out what it does, so my real question should be "what
> other stuff does it do that I might not expect? Any g
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Sunday 05 October 2008 20:16:55 Neil Bothwick wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 05 Oct 2008 20:08:23 +0200, b.n. wrote:
>>
>>> Could you share your relevant package.mask and package.keywords, for
>>> the laziest of us? :)
>>>
>> emerge autounmask
>> autounmask kde-meta
>>
On Sunday 05 October 2008 20:16:55 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sun, 05 Oct 2008 20:08:23 +0200, b.n. wrote:
> > Could you share your relevant package.mask and package.keywords, for
> > the laziest of us? :)
>
> emerge autounmask
> autounmask kde-meta
For the super-lazy amongst us, what does that pac
On Sun, 5 Oct 2008 20:59:25 +0200, Luigi Pinna wrote:
> I continue to have a blocking package (actually not installed):
>
> [blocks B ] <=x11-libs/qt-4.4.0_alpha:4 (is blocking x11-libs/qt-
> dbus-4.4.1, x11-libs/qt-script-4.4.1, x11-libs/qt-qt3support-4.4.1, x11-
> libs/qt-assistant-4.4.1, x
Alle domenica 05 ottobre 2008, Neil Bothwick ha scritto:
> On Sun, 05 Oct 2008 20:08:23 +0200, b.n. wrote:
> > Could you share your relevant package.mask and package.keywords,
> > for the laziest of us? :)
>
> emerge autounmask
> autounmask kde-meta
>
> :-)
I continue to have a blocking package (ac
On Sun, 05 Oct 2008 20:08:23 +0200, b.n. wrote:
> Could you share your relevant package.mask and package.keywords, for
> the laziest of us? :)
emerge autounmask
autounmask kde-meta
:-)
--
Neil Bothwick
The trouble with the world is that everybody in it is three drinks behind.
signature.asc
On Sunday 05 October 2008 20:08:23 b.n. wrote:
> Jerry McBride ha scritto:
> > Well, I took notice that kde 4.1.2 is in portage... I quickly removed
> > kde-svn and layman and began the unmasking and keywording of 4.1.2. I let
> > it all install over night and... This morning, with a little trepida
Jerry McBride ha scritto:
Well, I took notice that kde 4.1.2 is in portage... I quickly removed kde-svn
and layman and began the unmasking and keywording of 4.1.2. I let it all
install over night and... This morning, with a little trepidation, I booted
into KDE-4.1.2... no problems!
This is
Well, I took notice that kde 4.1.2 is in portage... I quickly removed kde-svn
and layman and began the unmasking and keywording of 4.1.2. I let it all
install over night and... This morning, with a little trepidation, I booted
into KDE-4.1.2... no problems!
This is the first of the recent kd
34 matches
Mail list logo
