[gentoo-user] KDE4 + python3.1 == no system-config-printer-kde ?

2011-06-13 Thread Dmitry S. Makovey
Hi everybody, Is it me missing out on something or does KDE4 (namely PyKDE4) is borked when default python is set to 3.1? # eselect python list Available Python interpreters: [1] python2.7 [2] python3.1 * # eselect python list --python3 Available Python 3 interpreters: [1] python3.1

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE4 + python3.1 == no system-config-printer-kde ?

2011-06-13 Thread Mick
On Tuesday 14 Jun 2011 06:43:14 Dmitry S. Makovey wrote: > Hi everybody, > > Is it me missing out on something or does KDE4 (namely PyKDE4) is borked > when default python is set to 3.1? > > > # eselect python list > Available Python interpreters: > [1] python2.7 > [2] python3.1 * > # es

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE4 + python3.1 == no system-config-printer-kde ?

2011-06-14 Thread Ulrich Drolshagen
Am Dienstag, 14. Juni 2011, 08:09:57 schrieb Mick: > > > > should I be performing some other waving in the air to make this whole > > thing fly? It seems like a bug to me, but I'd rather confirm I'm not > > missing something before reporting it. > > The last enews I read specifically warned *not

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE4 + python3.1 == no system-config-printer-kde ?

2011-06-14 Thread Dmitry Makovey
On 06/14/2011 12:09 AM, Mick wrote: > The last enews I read specifically warned *not* to turn on 3.1 and > instead > stay with the latest 2 version ... > > Do you have a specific reason that compels you to try to make KDE work with > 3.1? If memory serves me right it was on this list that I picked

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE4 + python3.1 == no system-config-printer-kde?

2011-06-14 Thread Mick
On Wednesday 15 Jun 2011 01:09:28 Dmitry Makovey wrote: > On 06/14/2011 12:09 AM, Mick wrote: > > The last enews I read specifically warned *not* to turn on 3.1 and > > instead > > stay with the latest 2 version ... > > > > Do you have a specific reason that compels you to try to make KDE work > >

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE4 + python3.1 == no system-config-printer-kde ?

2011-06-15 Thread Walter Dnes
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 07:38:56PM +0200, Ulrich Drolshagen wrote > I'm not Dmitry but I am using 3.1 too. 3.1 is set as default by stage1 for > some time now. No issues with 3.1 here though, at least none that > are related to python. Why do they set it default by stage1 and > warn not to use i