On 11/24/08, b.n. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, why? If you want to test 2.2 instead, you can do it. It's not
> blocking you from anything.
Yes, before the change the only thing blocking portage 2.2 was ~arch.
Now it requires the bigger tool, Thor's Hammer of Unmasking +5 (+15
against portage
GMail ha scritto:
> I ran into this same thing this morning and felt like mailing Zac a piece of
> my mind. Sanity prevailed though.
>
> I still feeling quite deeply offended though that a package maintainer has
> forced me to jump through a hoop simply because he would like an earlier
> versio
On Monday 24 November 2008 10:15:46 Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> portage-2.2.. has been masked.
> /usr/portage/profiles/package.mask tells me why
>
> "In order to ensure that portage-2.1.6 gets sufficient testing,
> portage-2.2 will be masked in package.mask until portage-2.1.6 has
> been mar
On Monday 24 November 2008 11:58:41 Dale wrote:
> Of course, there is the Gentoo monthly newsletter. Supposed to be
> monthly anyway. I haven't seen one in a while so it may be going
> quarterly this time. ;-)
Oh, you mean the GAN? As in Gentoo Annual Newsletter?
I understand why it's irregula
Daniel Pielmeier wrote:
> 2008/11/24 Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> Of course, there is the Gentoo monthly newsletter. Supposed to be
>> monthly anyway. I haven't seen one in a while so it may be going
>> quarterly this time. ;-)
>>
>> I do wish they had or would use a announce mailing list t
2008/11/24 Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Of course, there is the Gentoo monthly newsletter. Supposed to be
> monthly anyway. I haven't seen one in a while so it may be going
> quarterly this time. ;-)
>
> I do wish they had or would use a announce mailing list to inform people
> of changes, big
Daniel Pielmeier wrote:
>
> I will try to explain this a bit from what I know from mailing-lists and IRC.
>
> First there are no problems with portage-2.2. It has been masked
> because some features are not ready and thus are blocking
> stabilisation. As a conclusion portage-2.1.6 has been branched
2008/11/24 Helmut Jarausch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> portage-2.2.. has been masked.
> /usr/portage/profiles/package.mask tells me why
>
> "In order to ensure that portage-2.1.6 gets sufficient testing,
> portage-2.2 will be masked in package.mask until portage-2.1.6 has
> been marked stable.
Hi,
portage-2.2.. has been masked.
/usr/portage/profiles/package.mask tells me why
"In order to ensure that portage-2.1.6 gets sufficient testing,
portage-2.2 will be masked in package.mask until portage-2.1.6 has
been marked stable."
I feel like someone will try to educate me.
Yes, I can and
9 matches
Mail list logo
