Am 02.10.2010 14:44, schrieb Florian Philipp:
> Am 02.10.2010 14:11, schrieb Volker Armin Hemmann:
>> On Saturday 02 October 2010, Florian Philipp wrote:
> [...]
>>>
>>> Assumptions:
>>>
>>> 1. Seek time is constant. For HDDs we can take an average value. Of
>>> course this doesn't work for tapes.
Am 02.10.2010 14:11, schrieb Volker Armin Hemmann:
> On Saturday 02 October 2010, Florian Philipp wrote:
[...]
>>
>> Assumptions:
>>
>> 1. Seek time is constant. For HDDs we can take an average value. Of
>> course this doesn't work for tapes. They have a seek time which
>> increases linearly with t
On Saturday 02 October 2010, Florian Philipp wrote:
> Am 01.10.2010 18:23, schrieb Volker Armin Hemmann:
> > On Friday 01 October 2010, Florian Philipp wrote:
> >> Am 01.10.2010 03:12, schrieb Adam Carter:
> >>> Your harddisk seeks, everything is slow.
> >>>
> >>> So does that then mean that m
Am 01.10.2010 18:23, schrieb Volker Armin Hemmann:
> On Friday 01 October 2010, Florian Philipp wrote:
>> Am 01.10.2010 03:12, schrieb Adam Carter:
>>> Your harddisk seeks, everything is slow.
>>>
>>> So does that then mean that my options are;
>>> 1. Defragment, so there is less seeking
>>> 2.
>
> > > 1. Defragment, so there is less seeking
>
To this end i have found the scripts fragck.pl and defrag at
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-429915.html
For me;
# ./fragck.pl /home/adam/mp3/
77.6329693554068% non contiguous files, 27.4885523071504 average fragments.
Unfortunately defrag d
On Friday 01 October 2010, Florian Philipp wrote:
> Am 01.10.2010 03:12, schrieb Adam Carter:
> > Your harddisk seeks, everything is slow.
> >
> > So does that then mean that my options are;
> > 1. Defragment, so there is less seeking
> > 2. Get an SSD
> >
> > Since 2 is too expensive for a d
On 10/01/2010 03:12 AM, Adam Carter wrote:
> Your harddisk seeks, everything is slow.
>
> So does that then mean that my options are;
> 1. Defragment, so there is less seeking
> 2. Get an SSD
>
> Since 2 is too expensive for a decent size drive, is there anything i
> can do about 1 without a
Am 01.10.2010 03:12, schrieb Adam Carter:
> Your harddisk seeks, everything is slow.
>
> So does that then mean that my options are;
> 1. Defragment, so there is less seeking
> 2. Get an SSD
>
> Since 2 is too expensive for a decent size drive, is there anything i
> can do about 1 without a b
On Friday 01 October 2010, Adam Carter wrote:
> > Your harddisk seeks, everything is slow.
> >
> > So does that then mean that my options are;
>
> 1. Defragment, so there is less seeking
> 2. Get an SSD
>
> Since 2 is too expensive for a decent size drive, is there anything i can
> do about 1 wi
> Your harddisk seeks, everything is slow.
>
> So does that then mean that my options are;
1. Defragment, so there is less seeking
2. Get an SSD
Since 2 is too expensive for a decent size drive, is there anything i can do
about 1 without a backup and restore operation? Or will the fragmentation be
On Thursday 30 September 2010 17:50:41 Florian Philipp wrote:
> Am 30.09.2010 18:00, schrieb Peter Humphrey:
> > On Thursday 30 September 2010 14:10:42 Florian Philipp wrote:
> >> An HDD gets slower when you read the inner tracks. The angular
> >> velocity is constant (5400 RPM) while the tangenti
On Thursday 30 September 2010, Adam Carter wrote:
> Taring my mp3 collection from 2.5in 500MB internal sata drive (sda) to
> esata 3.5in 500MB drive (sdb) and it seems slow. In vmstat i can see that
> the external drive writes faster than the internal can read (external has
> periods of inactivity)
Am 30.09.2010 18:00, schrieb Peter Humphrey:
> On Thursday 30 September 2010 14:10:42 Florian Philipp wrote:
>
>> An HDD gets slower when you read the inner tracks. The angular
>> velocity is constant (5400 RPM) while the tangential velocity gets
>> lower with the radius.
>
> Are you telling us
On Thursday 30 September 2010 14:10:42 Florian Philipp wrote:
> An HDD gets slower when you read the inner tracks. The angular
> velocity is constant (5400 RPM) while the tangential velocity gets
> lower with the radius.
Are you telling us that the length of a stored bit is constant? I'd have
t
Am Donnerstag 30 September 2010, 12:58:36 schrieb Adam Carter:
> Taring my mp3 collection from 2.5in 500MB internal sata drive (sda) to
> esata 3.5in 500MB drive (sdb) and it seems slow. In vmstat i can see that
> the external drive writes faster than the internal can read (external has
> periods o
Taring my mp3 collection from 2.5in 500MB internal sata drive (sda) to esata
3.5in 500MB drive (sdb) and it seems slow. In vmstat i can see that the
external drive writes faster than the internal can read (external has
periods of inactivity)
# time tar cf /mnt/usbdrive/mp3back.tar mp3/
real10m
16 matches
Mail list logo