On 10 September 2010 11:40, Paul Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Hilco Wijbenga
> wrote:
>> So I'm confused. Why is package.mask not having any (apparent) effect
>> for pykde4? How do I prevent the downgrade?
>
> It's probably unmasked as well. I think unmask overrides mask.
>
On Fri, 10 Sep 2010 09:53:52 -0700, Hilco Wijbenga wrote:
> I decided that I did not want to go back to 4.5.1 so I added
>
> =kde-base/pykde4-4.5.1
>
> to /etc/portage/package.mask.
>
> To my utmost surprise, I got the exact same result as before when
> running the above emerge command again. I
On 09/10/2010 09:53 AM, Hilco Wijbenga wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> So I'm confused. Why is package.mask not having any (apparent) effect
> for pykde4? How do I prevent the downgrade?
pykde4-4.5.1-r1 was removed from the repository, not masked.
In order to keep 4.5.1-r1 you need to obtain a copy of the
Hilco Wijbenga wrote:
On 10 September 2010 10:25, Dale wrote:
Do you have the package listed in the unmask or keyword file? If so, it
ignores the mask file. Actually, I think it reads mask first then the
others.
Ah! Yes, I do.
That explains why package.mask is being ignored, I gue
J. Roeleveld writes:
> Strange, I don't have pykde4-4.5.1-r1 at all.
I do.
> What does "eix pykde4" say on your system?
> On mine it says:
> ***
> $ eix pykde4
> [I] kde-base/pykde4
> Available versions:
> (4.4) ~4.4.1[3] 4.4.5 **4.4.!m!t[1] **4.4.!m!t[2]
> (4.5)
Apparently, though unproven, at 18:53 on Friday 10 September 2010, Hilco
Wijbenga did opine thusly:
> Hi all,
>
> This morning I got
>
> centaur ~ # emerge -vDuNp world
>
> These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
>
> Calculating dependencies... done!
>
> [ebuild UD] kde-ba
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Hilco Wijbenga
wrote:
> So I'm confused. Why is package.mask not having any (apparent) effect
> for pykde4? How do I prevent the downgrade?
It's probably unmasked as well. I think unmask overrides mask.
As an alternative, you can try to eliminate pykde4 entirely
On 10 September 2010 10:25, Dale wrote:
> Do you have the package listed in the unmask or keyword file? If so, it
> ignores the mask file. Actually, I think it reads mask first then the
> others.
Ah! Yes, I do.
That explains why package.mask is being ignored, I guess, but I can't
think of a wa
On 10 September 2010 10:25, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> Strange, I don't have pykde4-4.5.1-r1 at all.
>
> What does "eix pykde4" say on your system?
> On mine it says:
> ***
> $ eix pykde4
> [I] kde-base/pykde4
> Available versions:
> (4.4) ~4.4.1[3] 4.4.5 **4.4.!m!t[1] **4.4.!m!t[2
Hilco Wijbenga wrote:
Hi all,
This morning I got
centaur ~ # emerge -vDuNp world
These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild UD] kde-base/pykde4-4.5.1 [4.5.1-r1] USE="semantic-desktop
(-aqua) -debug -doc -examples (-kdeenablefinal) (-k
On Friday 10 September 2010 18:53:52 Hilco Wijbenga wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This morning I got
>
> centaur ~ # emerge -vDuNp world
>
> These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
>
> Calculating dependencies... done!
>
> [ebuild UD] kde-base/pykde4-4.5.1 [4.5.1-r1] USE="semantic-de
Hi all,
This morning I got
centaur ~ # emerge -vDuNp world
These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild UD] kde-base/pykde4-4.5.1 [4.5.1-r1] USE="semantic-desktop
(-aqua) -debug -doc -examples (-kdeenablefinal) (-kdeprefix)" 0 kB
[1=>0]
12 matches
Mail list logo