Sent via BlackBerry® from Vodafone
-Original Message-
From: Matthias Bethke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 17:28:35
To:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Performance problem at writing big files and
Multitasking
Hi Daniel,
on Saturday, 2007
Hi Daniel,
on Saturday, 2007-02-10 at 12:49:14, you wrote:
> I will give short overview what i have tried so far.
>
> 1. Trying different I/O Scheduler ( cfq anticipatory and deadline)
> 2. Enabling Low latency kernel and Preemptible kernel
> 3. Setting 1000 HZ for timer frequency
> 4. Tried the n
Hi i am back again!
Unfortunately my problem is still bugging me!
I will give short overview what i have tried so far.
1. Trying different I/O Scheduler ( cfq anticipatory and deadline)
2. Enabling Low latency kernel and Preemptible kernel
3. Setting 1000 HZ for timer frequency
4. Tried the new
On Thu, 2007-02-08 at 11:42 +0100, Frédéric Grosshans wrote:
> Did you try to play with ionice to assign priority. It has helped me a
> lot with io-intensive background taskes.
I am trying to compile it to overcome some heavy-disk access performance
issues (ext3), but I can't! Not compatible wit
On Thursday 8 February 2007 19:34, Daniel Pielmeier wrote:
> Where can i get it. It seems to be included in util-linux but i have
> util-linux installed and ionice is missing!
It's explained here:
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-462230.html
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
> Did you try to play with ionice to assign priority. It has helped me a
> lot with io-intensive background taskes.
Where can i get it. It seems to be included in util-linux but i have
util-linux installed and ionice is missing!
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Le mardi 06 février 2007 à 22:28 +0100, Daniel Pielmeier a écrit :
> > What I/O scheduler are you using? Did you try to experiment with the
> > deadline or the cfq I/O schedulers?
> > If you have them enabled in your kernel config, read
> > Documentation/block/switching-sched.txt and see if thing
> The hdparm optimizations, the CFQ scheduler and maybe low latency
> desktop in the kernel are the best way to make your desktop useable
> under heavy disk usage.These are my hdparm settings:
>
> /dev/hda:
> multcount= 16 (on)
> IO_support = 1 (32-bit)
> unmaskirq= 1 (on)
> using_
On 2/7/07, Daniel Pielmeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
No other suggestions?
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Could your problem be similar to this:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=gentoo-user&m=114252338111258&w=2
Tom
Mike wrote:
> Daniel Pielmeier wrote:
> > No other suggestions?
>
> The hdparm optimizations, the CFQ scheduler and maybe low latency
> desktop in the kernel are the best way to make your desktop
> useable under heavy disk usage.
And check you have HZ set to 1000.
$ grep HZ /usr/src/linux/.config
The hdparm optimizations, the CFQ scheduler and maybe low latency
desktop in the kernel are the best way to make your desktop useable
under heavy disk usage.These are my hdparm settings:
[snip]
Thanks for your suggestions. As i have an SATA harddisk, can i use
hdparm with it , i thought it coul
Daniel Pielmeier wrote:
>> What I/O scheduler are you using? Did you try to experiment with the
>> deadline or the cfq I/O schedulers?
>> If you have them enabled in your kernel config, read
>> Documentation/block/switching-sched.txt and see if things get better
>> after changing the I/O scheduler
What I/O scheduler are you using? Did you try to experiment with the
deadline or the cfq I/O schedulers?
If you have them enabled in your kernel config, read
Documentation/block/switching-sched.txt and see if things get better
after changing the I/O scheduler for your hard disk.
Of course, your pr
> What I/O scheduler are you using? Did you try to experiment with the
> deadline or the cfq I/O schedulers?
> If you have them enabled in your kernel config, read
> Documentation/block/switching-sched.txt and see if things get better
> after changing the I/O scheduler for your hard disk.
> Of c
> What I/O scheduler are you using? Did you try to experiment with the
> deadline or the cfq I/O schedulers?
> If you have them enabled in your kernel config, read
> Documentation/block/switching-sched.txt and see if things get better
> after changing the I/O scheduler for your hard disk.
> Of c
Michael Schreckenbauer schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> Am Dienstag, 6. Februar 2007 schrieb Daniel Pielmeier:
>> Hi all,
>> i have bought components to assemble a new PC by myself.
>> This are the main components.
>
> that's very interesting. You seem to have exactly the same problem I posted
> one minute be
Hi,
Am Dienstag, 6. Februar 2007 schrieb Daniel Pielmeier:
> Hi all,
> i have bought components to assemble a new PC by myself.
> This are the main components.
that's very interesting. You seem to have exactly the same problem I posted
one minute before you :)
My machine is an amd64 3000, with v
On Tuesday 6 February 2007 21:31, Daniel Pielmeier wrote:
> On the other i recently recognized when i doing some video editing
> i.e. demultiplex the movie with projectx which shows the speed of
> writing video and audio to the disk. It writes about 200MB with about
> 25MB/s then it halts for abou
Hi all,
i have bought components to assemble a new PC by myself.
This are the main components.
Mainboard: ConRoeXFire-eSATA2 (Intel(r) 945P)
CPU:Core 2 Duo E6600 (2400 MHz)
RAM:Transcend DIMM 2x1 GB DDR2-667 (1024 MB)
Harddisk: Western Digital Caviar SE WD2000J
19 matches
Mail list logo