[gentoo-user] Portage 2.2.1 stabilized?

2013-09-09 Thread Tanstaafl
Wow... just noticed an update is available which, for me, means it has been stabilized (at least on amd64)... You'd think this would rate a news item and/or other major announcement, considering how long it has taken to get here... Anyway, really glad to see this happen, and thanks to the dev

Re: [gentoo-user] Portage 2.2.1 stabilized?

2013-09-09 Thread Jeff Horelick
On 9 September 2013 09:44, Tanstaafl wrote: > Wow... just noticed an update is available which, for me, means it has > been stabilized (at least on amd64)... > > You'd think this would rate a news item and/or other major announcement, > considering how long it has taken to get here... > > Anyway,

Re: [gentoo-user] Portage 2.2.1 stabilized?

2013-09-10 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Monday 09 Sep 2013 09:44:01 Tanstaafl wrote: > Wow... just noticed an update is available which, for me, means it has > been stabilized (at least on amd64)... --->8 > Now to wait a few days to see if there is any breakage to report (not > worried about it really, though, since it has actually

Re: [gentoo-user] Portage 2.2.1 stabilized?

2013-09-10 Thread Markos Chandras
On 10 September 2013 10:13, Peter Humphrey wrote: > On Monday 09 Sep 2013 09:44:01 Tanstaafl wrote: >> Wow... just noticed an update is available which, for me, means it has >> been stabilized (at least on amd64)... > > --->8 > >> Now to wait a few days to see if there is any breakage to report (n

Re: [gentoo-user] Portage 2.2.1 stabilized?

2013-09-10 Thread Dale
Peter Humphrey wrote: > Is it working for you, Dale? :-) [IP-] [ ] sys-apps/portage-2.2.1:0 Sun Aug 25 05:27:12 2013 >>> sys-apps/portage-2.2.1 So far, so good. I been using unstable, except for the version, for quite a while. Are you saying something is broke and it works for me?? O_

Re: [gentoo-user] Portage 2.2.1 stabilized?

2013-09-10 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Tuesday 10 Sep 2013 07:18:11 Dale wrote: > Peter Humphrey wrote: > > Is it working for you, Dale? :-) > So far, so good. I been using unstable, except for the version, > for quite a while. Are you saying something is broke and it works for > me?? O_O Seriously?? This is a joke right??

Re: [gentoo-user] Portage 2.2.1 stabilized?

2013-09-10 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Tuesday 10 Sep 2013 16:48:24 Hinnerk van Bruinehsen wrote: > Try [adding] -userpriv to your FEATURES (as in FEATURES="-userpriv") in > make.conf Nope. Didn't help. I see mention of "usersync" in the bug conversation, but I don't know what that means. I'll just wait for the fixed version, I

Re: [gentoo-user] Portage 2.2.1 stabilized?

2013-09-10 Thread Hinnerk van Bruinehsen
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 03:13:50PM +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote: > On Tuesday 10 Sep 2013 07:18:11 Dale wrote: > > Peter Humphrey wrote: > > > Is it working for you, Dale? :-) > > So far, so good. I been using unstable, except for the version, > > for quite a while. Are you saying something i

Re: [gentoo-user] Portage 2.2.1 stabilized?

2013-09-10 Thread David W Noon
On Tue, 10 Sep 2013 16:28:55 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote about Re: [gentoo-user] Portage 2.2.1 stabilized?: > On Tuesday 10 Sep 2013 16:48:24 Hinnerk van Bruinehsen wrote: > > > Try [adding] -userpriv to your FEATURES (as in > > FEATURES="-userpriv") in make.conf &g

Re: [gentoo-user] Portage 2.2.1 stabilized?

2013-09-11 Thread Dale
Peter Humphrey wrote: > On Tuesday 10 Sep 2013 07:18:11 Dale wrote: >> Peter Humphrey wrote: >>> Is it working for you, Dale? :-) >> So far, so good. I been using unstable, except for the version, >> for quite a while. Are you saying something is broke and it works for >> me?? O_O Seriousl

Re: [gentoo-user] Portage 2.2.1 stabilized?

2013-09-11 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Tuesday 10 Sep 2013 16:44:36 David W Noon wrote: > I did the following: > > chown -R portage:portage /usr/portage /var/lib/portage /usr/local/portage > > and that fixed things. This assumes you use a userid of "portage" in a > group named "portage" to maintain your system. Nope, that didn't

Re: [gentoo-user] Portage 2.2.1 stabilized?

2013-09-11 Thread Tanstaafl
On 2013-09-10 10:13 AM, Peter Humphrey wrote: On Tuesday 10 Sep 2013 07:18:11 Dale wrote: Peter Humphrey wrote: Is it working for you, Dale? :-) So far, so good. I been using unstable, except for the version, for quite a while. Are you saying something is broke and it works for me?? O

Re: [gentoo-user] Portage 2.2.1 stabilized?

2013-09-11 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Wednesday 11 Sep 2013 07:14:30 Tanstaafl wrote: > Well, according to that bug, the fix is IN 2.2.1 (well, it says the fix > is in 2.1.13 and 2.2.0_alpha189, which means it is (should be?) in 2.2.1... > > So it can't be this bug? Whether that's true or not, I've found the problem. It was my ow

Re: [gentoo-user] Portage 2.2.1 stabilized?

2013-09-11 Thread Dale
Peter Humphrey wrote: > Sorry to cause you palpitations, Dale. Portage wasn't at fault - I was! Well, as some know, I'm disabled. Right now, my brother is fighting cancer. My 80 year old Mom is having issues, took her to the ER the other day and plan to take her to the regular Dr tomorrow. The