Pandu Poluan wrote:
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 14:33, Dale wrote:
Well, it could be that I'm reading the error incorrectly too. Ask people
how much fun it is for me to figure out what the heck portage is puking on
my keyboard. I have had Alan explain it to me, what he says makes sense but
it
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 14:33, Dale wrote:
> Well, it could be that I'm reading the error incorrectly too. Ask people
> how much fun it is for me to figure out what the heck portage is puking on
> my keyboard. I have had Alan explain it to me, what he says makes sense but
> it just goes right ov
Sebastian Beßler wrote:
Am 16.08.2011 02:18, schrieb Dale:
Sebastian Beßler wrote:
But why was autounmask=y complaining but not autounmask=n?
The dependency of the virtual was missing both times so shouldn't emerge
spit some error out both times?
Greetings
Sebastian
Becau
Am 16.08.2011 02:18, schrieb Dale:
> Sebastian Beßler wrote:
>>
>> But why was autounmask=y complaining but not autounmask=n?
>> The dependency of the virtual was missing both times so shouldn't emerge
>> spit some error out both times?
>>
>> Greetings
>>
>> Sebastian
>>
>>
>
> Because autounm
Sebastian Beßler wrote:
But why was autounmask=y complaining but not autounmask=n?
The dependency of the virtual was missing both times so shouldn't emerge
spit some error out both times?
Greetings
Sebastian
Because autounmask=n assumes you don't want to upgrade anything that is
masked
Am 15.08.2011 23:33, schrieb Paul Hartman:
> Use --tree to get a better idea what package wants the newer ExtUtils-ParseXS
I narrowed it down to
emerge perl-core/Module-Build -vp
These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
Calculating dependencies ... done!
[ebuild
Sebastian Beßler wrote:
Am 15.08.2011 21:34, schrieb Alan McKinnon:
Do you have autounmask enabled or disabled in your config for portage?
I have it enabled because it is enabled by default. You have to explicit
disable it.
So, because it is enabled by default, I never asked portage
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 12:31 PM, Sebastian Beßler
wrote:
> Why is autounmask trying to unmask ExtUtils-ParseXS if it's not needed?
> Should I report this as a bug?
I think it's only telling you what you should unmask. Setting
--autounmask=n simply makes it stop giving you this hint.
To actually
Am 15.08.2011 21:34, schrieb Alan McKinnon:
> Do you have autounmask enabled or disabled in your config for portage?
I have it enabled because it is enabled by default. You have to explicit
disable it.
So, because it is enabled by default, I never asked portage to
autounmask anything for me.
s
On Mon 15 August 2011 15:12:09 Dale did opine thusly:
> Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > Do you have autounmask enabled or disabled in your config for
> > portage?
> >
> > That first example you gave strongly indicates you have it
> > enabled.
> I'm thinking the same thing. It seems to be enabled by defa
Alan McKinnon wrote:
Do you have autounmask enabled or disabled in your config for portage?
That first example you gave strongly indicates you have it enabled.
I'm thinking the same thing. It seems to be enabled by default I
think. I know it is here and I didn't do it. It just sort
On Mon 15 August 2011 20:55:12 Sebastian Beßler did opine thusly:
> Am 15.08.2011 20:02, schrieb Alan McKinnon:
> > It's not a bug, portage is doing what it should.
> >
> > In the first case portage will try upgrade all packages to the
> > latest version. It sees that you asked it to try autounmas
Am 15.08.2011 20:02, schrieb Alan McKinnon:
> It's not a bug, portage is doing what it should.
>
> In the first case portage will try upgrade all packages to the latest
> version. It sees that you asked it to try autounmask stuff, so it
> wants to override your local mask for ExtUtils-ParseXS.
On Mon 15 August 2011 19:31:37 Sebastian Beßler did opine thusly:
> I just tried
>
> emerge -DuN @world @system -va
>
> and got:
>
> These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
>
> Calculating dependencies ... done!
> [ebuild U ] perl-core/ExtUtils-ParseXS-3.20.0 [2.22.06] 0 kB
I just tried
emerge -DuN @world @system -va
and got:
These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
Calculating dependencies ... done!
[ebuild U ] perl-core/ExtUtils-ParseXS-3.20.0 [2.22.06] 0 kB
[ebuild U ] www-client/firefox-bin-5.0 [3.6.19]
USE="startup-notification"
[ebuil
15 matches
Mail list logo
