I want to install PostgreSQL but I'm wondering which package to use.
The obvious choice (dev-db/postgresql) installs 8.2.7 but
dev-db/postgresql-server installs 8.3.5. (I see they even use the same
tarball.) Is postgresql-server is the proper way going forward?
What about
On Sunday 21 December 2008 23:45:33 Hilco Wijbenga wrote:
I want to install PostgreSQL but I'm wondering which package to use.
The obvious choice (dev-db/postgresql) installs 8.2.7 but
dev-db/postgresql-server installs 8.3.5. (I see they even use the same
tarball.) Is postgresql-server is the
Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com writes:
postgresql-server is not something new, it's a new way of packaging an
existing product. It's like the monolithic/split KDE ebuilds, the new split
postgresql packages make the dev's life easier, and make it possible for you
to make more modular
On Monday 22 December 2008 00:07:01 Graham Murray wrote:
Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com writes:
postgresql-server is not something new, it's a new way of packaging an
existing product. It's like the monolithic/split KDE ebuilds, the new
split postgresql packages make the dev's life
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 02:01:59AM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
What's the rationale behind that? I can see why someone might want two or
more
versions of php, python, perl or mysql.
But postgresql? I can't imagine why it would be useful to the majority to
have
SLOTs for postgresql.
On Monday 22 December 2008 03:01:07 fe...@crowfix.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 02:01:59AM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
What's the rationale behind that? I can see why someone might want two or
more versions of php, python, perl or mysql.
But postgresql? I can't imagine why it would
6 matches
Mail list logo
