On Sun, Sep 17, 2006 at 11:23:27AM -0700, Kevin O'Gorman wrote
> Thanks all. I added "r128" which seemed the closest to what I
> actually have, and I'm now back running with everything coming up
> on reboot. I may fool with the proprietary driver, but it doesn't
> matter too much -- my use does
On 9/17/06, Ryan Tandy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
> I was under the impression my video card was too old for the binary driver.
> It's built into the motherboard but reports as
>ATI Technologies Inc Rage XL rev 39
> does anybody know if the binary would help?
>
> ++ kevi
Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
I was under the impression my video card was too old for the binary driver.
It's built into the motherboard but reports as
ATI Technologies Inc Rage XL rev 39
does anybody know if the binary would help?
++ kevin
You want VIDEO_CARDS="mach64". Be warned that this driver
On 9/17/06, Mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sunday 17 September 2006 15:53, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
> On 9/17/06, Bo Ørsted Andresen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Saturday 16 September 2006 18:52, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
> > > That's good to head. I can't get the ATI module compiled in. I thou
On Sunday 17 September 2006 15:53, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
> On 9/17/06, Bo Ørsted Andresen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Saturday 16 September 2006 18:52, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
> > > That's good to head. I can't get the ATI module compiled in. I thought
> > > I was doing the right thing followin
On 9/17/06, Bo Ørsted Andresen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Saturday 16 September 2006 18:52, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
> That's good to head. I can't get the ATI module compiled in. I thought I
> was doing the right thing following the howto when I put this in
> /etc/make.conf, but it gets ignored:
On Saturday 16 September 2006 18:52, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
> That's good to head. I can't get the ATI module compiled in. I thought I
> was doing the right thing following the howto when I put this in
> /etc/make.conf, but it gets ignored:
> VIDEO_CARDS="vga vesa fbdev ati"
> I get the first
On Thursday 14 September 2006 18:46, Dan Johansson wrote:
> Today I did the "mistake" of re-emerging
> (emerge --update --deep --verbose --newuse world --pretend
> ) x11-base/xorg-x11-6.8.2-r8 as a result of a changed USE-flag
> (GAPING_SECURITY_HOLE). Now when I try to do a new
> emerge --update -
Today I did the "mistake" of re-emerging
(emerge --update --deep --verbose --newuse world --pretend
) x11-base/xorg-x11-6.8.2-r8 as a result of a changed USE-flag
(GAPING_SECURITY_HOLE). Now when I try to do a new
emerge --update --deep --verbose --newuse world --pretend
I am getting a lot of b
9 matches
Mail list logo