On Saturday 03 Nov 2012 00:22:52 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Sat, 3 Nov 2012 00:11:34 +
>
> Mick wrote:
> > On Friday 02 Nov 2012 06:21:39 Mick wrote:
> > > On Thursday 01 Nov 2012 13:46:20 Mark Knecht wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 11:54 PM, Mick
> > > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > On T
On Sat, 3 Nov 2012 00:11:34 +
Mick wrote:
> On Friday 02 Nov 2012 06:21:39 Mick wrote:
> > On Thursday 01 Nov 2012 13:46:20 Mark Knecht wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 11:54 PM, Mick
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Thursday 01 Nov 2012 03:53:44 Bill Kenworthy wrote:
> > > >> On Wed, 2012-10-31
On Friday 02 Nov 2012 06:21:39 Mick wrote:
> On Thursday 01 Nov 2012 13:46:20 Mark Knecht wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 11:54 PM, Mick wrote:
> > > On Thursday 01 Nov 2012 03:53:44 Bill Kenworthy wrote:
> > >> On Wed, 2012-10-31 at 23:12 -0400, Philip Webb wrote:
> > >> > 121101 Bill Kenworth
On Thursday 01 Nov 2012 13:46:20 Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 11:54 PM, Mick wrote:
> > On Thursday 01 Nov 2012 03:53:44 Bill Kenworthy wrote:
> >> On Wed, 2012-10-31 at 23:12 -0400, Philip Webb wrote:
> >> > 121101 Bill Kenworthy wrote:
> >> > > On Wed, 2012-10-31 at 22:46 +,
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 11:54 PM, Mick wrote:
> On Thursday 01 Nov 2012 03:53:44 Bill Kenworthy wrote:
>> On Wed, 2012-10-31 at 23:12 -0400, Philip Webb wrote:
>> > 121101 Bill Kenworthy wrote:
>> > > On Wed, 2012-10-31 at 22:46 +, Mick wrote:
>> > >> I was thinking of using razor-qt
>> > >
>>
Am Donnerstag, 1. November 2012, 10:52:37 schrieb Markos Chandras:
> Yeah, it is a lightweight-KDE if I may say. It is pretty stable though
> and upstream is very responsive to bugs and
> feature requests. Go for it ;)
I tried it, too, last week or so. It is still quite limited, although many
ne
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 10:21 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Nov 2012 06:54:04 +, Mick wrote:
>
>> Has anyone tried it and can comment how it compares to KDE?
>
> I tried it a while ago and it didn't compare to KDE, nor should it, in
> the same way the LXDE shouldn't be compared to GNOME.
On Thu, 1 Nov 2012 06:54:04 +, Mick wrote:
> Has anyone tried it and can comment how it compares to KDE?
I tried it a while ago and it didn't compare to KDE, nor should it, in
the same way the LXDE shouldn't be compared to GNOME.
It's more like LXDE on QT, but was more limited when I tried i
On Thursday 01 Nov 2012 03:53:44 Bill Kenworthy wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-10-31 at 23:12 -0400, Philip Webb wrote:
> > 121101 Bill Kenworthy wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2012-10-31 at 22:46 +, Mick wrote:
> > >> I was thinking of using razor-qt
> > >
> > > From the Oct 20 automated package removal email
>
On Wed, 2012-10-31 at 23:12 -0400, Philip Webb wrote:
> 121101 Bill Kenworthy wrote:
> > On Wed, 2012-10-31 at 22:46 +, Mick wrote:
> >> I was thinking of using razor-qt
> > From the Oct 20 automated package removal email
> > you might want to investigate why before moving to it.
> > x11-wm/r
121101 Bill Kenworthy wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-10-31 at 22:46 +, Mick wrote:
>> I was thinking of using razor-qt
> From the Oct 20 automated package removal email
> you might want to investigate why before moving to it.
> x11-wm/razorqt 2012-10-22 10:00:01 yngwin
>
On Wed, 2012-10-31 at 22:46 +, Mick wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> An old Pentium 4 machine which is refusing to die, is getting problematic
> running the full KDE desktop. I was thinking of using razor-qt which has a
> broadly similar look so as to not alienate the users (they mostly use KDE
> apps
Hi All,
An old Pentium 4 machine which is refusing to die, is getting problematic
running the full KDE desktop. I was thinking of using razor-qt which has a
broadly similar look so as to not alienate the users (they mostly use KDE
apps).
Have any of you tried it out on a stable Gentoo and are
13 matches
Mail list logo
