On Tuesday 22 Oct 2013 08:10:18 Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
> The 21/10/13, Mick wrote:
> > I'm fast gravitating towards this option ...
> >
> > Although with metadata 0.90 I was able to progress with the installation
> > (after I deselected the swap partitions) the grub-install script wanted
> > to i
The 21/10/13, Mick wrote:
> I'm fast gravitating towards this option ...
>
> Although with metadata 0.90 I was able to progress with the installation
> (after I deselected the swap partitions) the grub-install script wanted to
> install in /dev/md127p1 but it failed. I had to override the Ubun
On Monday 21 Oct 2013 09:55:42 J. Roeleveld wrote:
> Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
> >I believe it would only be possible by installing the system on the
> >degraded RAID, which will likely mean coming back to the original swap
> >problem.
>
> That is why I suggested installing on a normal single disk
Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
>The 21/10/13, J. Roeleveld wrote:
>
>>Other option:
>>1 install to single disk
>>
>>2 using sysresccd create a degraded raid1 using the 2nd drive
>>
>>3 copy the partitions and date from drive 1 to the degraded raid
>device
>
>What is "copy the date"?
A
The 21/10/13, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> Ha! Yes, this made a difference, thanks! With metadata 0.90 I can see the
> same partitions I set up on /dev/md0, also on /dev/sda and /dev/sdb.
Sorry to come back late in this thread. As other contributors pointed
out correctly, the problem was RAID metada
Mick wrote:
>On Sunday 20 Oct 2013 15:31:12 jo...@antarean.org wrote:
>
>> I would suggest trying it by usong the older metadata format.
>> Check the man pages, but I thinl it would be --metadata=0.90 (or
>similar)
>> during creation. That might put the metadata at the end, rather then
>at
>> the
On Sunday 20 Oct 2013 15:31:12 jo...@antarean.org wrote:
> I would suggest trying it by usong the older metadata format.
> Check the man pages, but I thinl it would be --metadata=0.90 (or similar)
> during creation. That might put the metadata at the end, rather then at
> the front. (Or it's the o
Michael Hampicke wrote:
>Am 20.10.2013 15:13, schrieb Mick:
>> On Sunday 20 Oct 2013 13:57:34 Michael Hampicke wrote:
>>> Am 20.10.2013 11:54, schrieb Mick:
Any ideas why the Ubuntu installation won't boot?
>>>
>>> My guess would be, you cannot boot, because if you install grub in
>>> /dev/md
Am 20.10.2013 15:13, schrieb Mick:
> On Sunday 20 Oct 2013 13:57:34 Michael Hampicke wrote:
>> Am 20.10.2013 11:54, schrieb Mick:
>>> Any ideas why the Ubuntu installation won't boot?
>>
>> My guess would be, you cannot boot, because if you install grub in
>> /dev/md0.
>>
>> Upon boot the bios cann
On Sunday 20 Oct 2013 13:57:34 Michael Hampicke wrote:
> Am 20.10.2013 11:54, schrieb Mick:
> > Any ideas why the Ubuntu installation won't boot?
>
> My guess would be, you cannot boot, because if you install grub in
> /dev/md0.
>
> Upon boot the bios cannot find stage1 of the bootloader, which n
Am 20.10.2013 11:54, schrieb Mick:
> Any ideas why the Ubuntu installation won't boot?
>
My guess would be, you cannot boot, because if you install grub in /dev/md0.
Upon boot the bios cannot find stage1 of the bootloader, which normally
lies in the MBR (which also houses the partition table).
On Wednesday 16 Oct 2013 21:14:38 Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 08:10:40PM +0200, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 10:42:18PM +0100, Mick wrote:
> > > mdadm --create --auto=mdp --verbose /dev/md_d0 --level=mirror
> > > --raid-devices=2 /dev/sda /dev/sdb
> > >
12 matches
Mail list logo
