[gentoo-user] Re: Ansible, puppet and chef

2014-09-17 Thread Hans de Graaff
On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 22:43:18 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: Puppet seems to me a good product for a large site with 1000 hosts. Not so much for ~20 or so. Plus puppet's language and configs get large and hard to keep track of - lots and lots of directory trees with many things mentioning other

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Ansible, puppet and chef

2014-09-17 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 17/09/2014 07:46, Hans de Graaff wrote: On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 22:43:18 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: Puppet seems to me a good product for a large site with 1000 hosts. Not so much for ~20 or so. Plus puppet's language and configs get large and hard to keep track of - lots and lots of

[gentoo-user] Re: Ansible, puppet and chef

2014-09-16 Thread James
Alec Ten Harmsel alec at alectenharmsel.com writes: We use bcfg2, and all I can say is to stay away. XML abuse runs rampant in bcfg2. From what I've heard from other professional sysadmins, Puppet is the favorite, but that's mostly conjecture. Hi Alec! Anyone here used ansible What are