[gentoo-user] Re: Eeek: Apache2 lost it's CGI ability

2009-02-17 Thread James
Kevin O'Gorman gmail.com> writes: > But this much I know: > The permissions on the failing (python) script are the same. So are > the owner and group. > The python script runs fine from the command-line, even as an "other" user. Hello Kevin, 2 things. Have your run 'python-updater' since you

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Eeek: Apache2 lost it's CGI ability

2009-02-15 Thread Kevin O'Gorman
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 5:23 PM, Kevin O'Gorman wrote: > On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 4:44 PM, Harry Putnam wrote: >> "Kevin O'Gorman" writes: >> >>> I don't get much help from the logs. The access log shows that the >>> request got an error code, >>> 64.166.164.49 - - [15/Feb/2009:15:46:32 -0800] "

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Eeek: Apache2 lost it's CGI ability

2009-02-15 Thread Kevin O'Gorman
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 4:44 PM, Harry Putnam wrote: > "Kevin O'Gorman" writes: > >> I don't get much help from the logs. The access log shows that the >> request got an error code, >> 64.166.164.49 - - [15/Feb/2009:15:46:32 -0800] "GET /hex-bin/board >> HTTP/1.1" 500 542 >> >> and all that the

[gentoo-user] Re: Eeek: Apache2 lost it's CGI ability

2009-02-15 Thread Harry Putnam
"Kevin O'Gorman" writes: > I don't get much help from the logs. The access log shows that the > request got an error code, > 64.166.164.49 - - [15/Feb/2009:15:46:32 -0800] "GET /hex-bin/board > HTTP/1.1" 500 542 > > and all that the error log says is: > [Sun Feb 15 15:46:32 2009] [error] [clien