On Wed, 27 Jan 2016 09:31:26 +0100 Kai Krakow wrote:
> Am Tue, 26 Jan 2016 20:02:47 +0300
> schrieb Andrew Savchenko :
>
> > I have thoughts about caching NFS using filescached, but limited
> > durability of the drive (400 TBW warranty for 512 GB size) restrains
> > me here. Probably I'll use it f
Hi,
On Tue, 26 Jan 2016 17:29:36 + (UTC) James wrote:
> > I have thoughts about caching NFS using filescached, but limited
> > durability of the drive (400 TBW warranty for 512 GB size) restrains
> > me here. Probably I'll use it for caching only in exceptional cases
> > (e.g. slow remote moun
Am Tue, 26 Jan 2016 20:02:47 +0300
schrieb Andrew Savchenko :
> I have thoughts about caching NFS using filescached, but limited
> durability of the drive (400 TBW warranty for 512 GB size) restrains
> me here. Probably I'll use it for caching only in exceptional cases
> (e.g. slow remote mounts l
Andrew Savchenko gentoo.org> writes:
> > > 3. Performance. This is natural to strive to get full speed
> > https://bcache.evilpiepirate.org/
> While bcache is a great technology, this is not what I need here.
> On this box NVMe will be the only storage and / will be placed
> there. All other d
Hi,
On Mon, 25 Jan 2016 02:50:23 + (UTC) James wrote:
> Andrew Savchenko gentoo.org> writes:
>
> > 3. Performance. This is natural to strive to get full speed and
> > minimal latency from such a yummy storage.
>
> bcahce?
> https://bcache.evilpiepirate.org/
While bcache is a great technolo
Andrew Savchenko gentoo.org> writes:
> 3. Performance. This is natural to strive to get full speed and
> minimal latency from such a yummy storage.
bcahce?
https://bcache.evilpiepirate.org/
> Andrew Savchenko
hth,
James
6 matches
Mail list logo
