Re: [gentoo-user] Re: HTML editor WYSIWYG

2013-03-18 Thread Mick
On Tuesday 19 Mar 2013 01:14:23 Peter Humphrey wrote: > On Monday 18 March 2013 14:10:40 Grant Edwards wrote: > > There's no such thing as a WYSIWYG HTML editor > > Depends. Kompozer is built on the Firefox tree, so if Firefox gives you > what you want to see, Kompozer will be WYSIWYG.. > > On th

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: HTML editor WYSIWYG

2013-03-18 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Monday 18 March 2013 14:10:40 Grant Edwards wrote: > There's no such thing as a WYSIWYG HTML editor Depends. Kompozer is built on the Firefox tree, so if Firefox gives you what you want to see, Kompozer will be WYSIWYG.. On the other hand, its HTML is not pure, the application is buggy and i

Re: [Bulk] Re: [gentoo-user] Re: HTML editor WYSIWYG

2013-03-18 Thread Kevin Chadwick
> sublimetext is nice, not OSS though Netbeans is quite useful for html5. Also chrome and firefox have good developer options so you can try changes and see them without a refresh. When I load my pages in a browser they are fine but in every WYSIWYG editor I have tried they are desimated to unread

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: HTML editor WYSIWYG

2013-03-18 Thread Andrew Hoffman
sublimetext is nice, not OSS though:/ -Andy On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 9:10 AM, Grant Edwards wrote: > On 2013-03-17, Joseph wrote: > > > Any recommendation for HTML editor Graphical. > > I've tried to use Open Office but it not user friendly. > > There's no such thing as a WYSIWYG HTML editor, si

[gentoo-user] Re: HTML editor WYSIWYG

2013-03-18 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2013-03-17, Joseph wrote: > Any recommendation for HTML editor Graphical. > I've tried to use Open Office but it not user friendly. There's no such thing as a WYSIWYG HTML editor, since WYG depends on the redering engine, display size, and various browser settings... -- Grant Edwards