On Samstag 29 Mai 2010, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Saturday 29 May 2010 10:16:39 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> > On Samstag 29 Mai 2010, Andrea Conti wrote:
> > > > ata1.00: failed command: READ DMA
> > > > ata1.00: cmd c8/00:80:00:3f:c1/00:00:00:00:00/e0 tag 0 dma 65536 in
> > > >
> > > >
Hi,
> I tried these kernels (all vanilla):
> 2.6.32.13
> 2.6.33.5
> 2.6.34.0
So it's not a known problem that has been fixed.
Just a wild guess... can you try recompiling the kernel *without*
pata_via? Some people have reported having problems with sata drives on
VIA controllers when pata_via is
On Saturday 29 May 2010 10:16:39 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> On Samstag 29 Mai 2010, Andrea Conti wrote:
> > > ata1.00: failed command: READ DMA
> > > ata1.00: cmd c8/00:80:00:3f:c1/00:00:00:00:00/e0 tag 0 dma 65536 in
> > >
> > > res 51/84:4f:00:3f:c1/00:00:00:00:00/e0 Emask 0x10 (ATA
Andrea Conti [10-05-29 10:08]:
> > ata1.00: failed command: READ DMA
> > ata1.00: cmd c8/00:80:00:3f:c1/00:00:00:00:00/e0 tag 0 dma 65536 in
> > res 51/84:4f:00:3f:c1/00:00:00:00:00/e0 Emask 0x10 (ATA bus error)
> > ata1.00: status: { DRDY ERR }
> > ata1.00: error: { ICRC ABRT }
> > ata1:
On Samstag 29 Mai 2010, Andrea Conti wrote:
> > ata1.00: failed command: READ DMA
> > ata1.00: cmd c8/00:80:00:3f:c1/00:00:00:00:00/e0 tag 0 dma 65536 in
> >
> > res 51/84:4f:00:3f:c1/00:00:00:00:00/e0 Emask 0x10 (ATA bus
> > error)
> >
> > ata1.00: status: { DRDY ERR }
> > ata1
> ata1.00: failed command: READ DMA
> ata1.00: cmd c8/00:80:00:3f:c1/00:00:00:00:00/e0 tag 0 dma 65536 in
> res 51/84:4f:00:3f:c1/00:00:00:00:00/e0 Emask 0x10 (ATA bus error)
> ata1.00: status: { DRDY ERR }
> ata1.00: error: { ICRC ABRT }
> ata1: soft resetting link
> ata1.00: configured f
walt [10-05-29 03:21]:
> On 05/27/2010 06:54 PM, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
>
> >ata1.00: configured for UDMA/33
>
> I know nothing about the new large-sector disks, but the line above
> makes
> me worried that the disk driver doesn't know any more than I do :)
>
> Anyone know if that is the e
On 05/27/2010 06:54 PM, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
ata1.00: configured for UDMA/33
I know nothing about the new large-sector disks, but the line above makes
me worried that the disk driver doesn't know any more than I do :)
Anyone know if that is the expected response from the disk driver?
Andrea Conti [10-05-27 17:20]:
> > I was more thinking of a tool, which test the whole disc surface
> > and reports every bad sector.
>
> badblocks -wvs (which takes forever, but in my experience is quite good
> at make failing disks actually fail ;)
>
> During the test you can monitor the smart
> I was more thinking of a tool, which test the whole disc surface
> and reports every bad sector.
badblocks -wvs (which takes forever, but in my experience is quite good
at make failing disks actually fail ;)
During the test you can monitor the smart attributes (smartctl -A, esp.
the reallocated
On 27 May 2010, at 01:19, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
...
Is there any way to check the disk without damaging its
contents?
If you have copied from /dev/sda to /dev/sdb then `md5sum /dev/sda /
dev/sdb` will compare both drives. You're probably safest to compare a
partition at a time `md5sum
On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 11:52 +0800, W.Kenworthy wrote:
> So something like SMART is the only way for the average Joe to get the
> health of a drive.
>
> Google has lots on this sort of thing
That sentence is correct in more than one way! "Google the generic term
for any web page found via search
On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 04:43 +0200, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> walt [10-05-27 04:08]:
> > On 05/26/2010 05:19 PM, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> >
> > >Is there any way to check the disk without damaging its
> > >contents?
> >
> > Do you know about SMART? Install sys-apps/smartmontools if you
>
walt [10-05-27 04:08]:
> On 05/26/2010 05:19 PM, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
>
> >Is there any way to check the disk without damaging its
> >contents?
>
> Do you know about SMART? Install sys-apps/smartmontools if you
> don't already have it, and read the manpage for smartctl.
>
> I add smartd
On 05/26/2010 05:19 PM, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
Is there any way to check the disk without damaging its
contents?
Do you know about SMART? Install sys-apps/smartmontools if you
don't already have it, and read the manpage for smartctl.
I add smartd to my default runlevel so the hard drives
Neil Bothwick [10-05-27 02:04]:
> On Wed, 26 May 2010 21:13:06 +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
>
> > that is why I used 'usually' and 'shouldn't'.
>
> Have you considered a career in politics? ;-)
>
>
> --
> Neil Bothwick
>
> A clean desk is a sign of a cluttered desk drawer.
Oh, uhh...I
On Wed, 26 May 2010 21:13:06 +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> that is why I used 'usually' and 'shouldn't'.
Have you considered a career in politics? ;-)
--
Neil Bothwick
A clean desk is a sign of a cluttered desk drawer.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Mittwoch 26 Mai 2010, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Wed, 26 May 2010 19:59:32 +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> > > May be: The WD-harddiscs are SATA2 my controllers are "only" SATA1...
> > > is it this, which cause the problems?
> >
> > usually it shouldn't.
>
> It has done for me in the past
On Wed, 26 May 2010 19:59:32 +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> > May be: The WD-harddiscs are SATA2 my controllers are "only" SATA1...
> > is it this, which cause the problems?
> usually it shouldn't.
It has done for me in the past. SATA2 drives usually have a jumper to
switch them to SATA1.
On Mittwoch 26 Mai 2010, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> Grant Edwards [10-05-26 17:19]:
> > On 2010-05-26, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> > > [...] I have two WDC WD10EARS-00Y5B1 (pasted from
> > > hdparm -i) harddisk (1TB, advanced format 4096 kb sectors).
> > >
> > >[...]
> > >
> > > dd if=/d
Grant Edwards [10-05-26 17:19]:
> On 2010-05-26, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
>
> > [...] I have two WDC WD10EARS-00Y5B1 (pasted from
> > hdparm -i) harddisk (1TB, advanced format 4096 kb sectors).
> >[...]
> >
> > dd if=/dev/sda of=/dev/sdb bs=8192
> >
> > which gave me a LOT of I/O errors
On 2010-05-26, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> [...] I have two WDC WD10EARS-00Y5B1 (pasted from
> hdparm -i) harddisk (1TB, advanced format 4096 kb sectors).
>[...]
>
> dd if=/dev/sda of=/dev/sdb bs=8192
>
> which gave me a LOT of I/O errors after a short time.
>
>[...]
>
> From what kernel
22 matches
Mail list logo