On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 11:29 PM, James wirel...@tampabay.rr.com wrote:
Rich Freeman rich0 at gentoo.org writes:
for (BS) Big Science, imho. BS needs all resources solving and
supporting a single problem, with as low of latency as possible.
What kind of latency are you expecting to get
Rich Freeman rich0 at gentoo.org writes:
Don't get me wrong - I appreciate the desire for bare-metal
performance in the high-performance computing world. I've heard
stories/rumors of Gentoo getting attention elsewhere in this domain,
and we have a disproportionate number of physical
Rich Freeman rich0 at gentoo.org writes:
for (BS) Big Science, imho. BS needs all resources solving and
supporting a single problem, with as low of latency as possible.
What kind of latency are you expecting to get with Gentoo running on
CoreOS? A process inside a container is no
Dale rdalek1967 at gmail.com writes:
Blueness is a wonderful and collegial type of dev
and is currently seeking input on his 'alpha' ideas::
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:RelEng_GRS
His work is progressing and there are (3) major versions just
posted to gentoo-dev.
So this is
Rich Freeman rich0 at gentoo.org writes:
Besides, if I want to deploy 50 systems for a cluster, one at a time in
parallel what do you recommend? via handbook? The modern diversity of
hardware options has rendered the gentoo handbook, dysfunctional,
at best, imho. ymmv.
I have mixed
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 3:28 PM, James wirel...@tampabay.rr.com wrote:
You are right and you are wrong:: Openstack nor CoreOS are the best approach
for (BS) Big Science, imho. BS needs all resources solving and supporting a
single problem, with as low of latency as possible.
What kind of
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 11:39 AM, James wirel...@tampabay.rr.com wrote:
Dale rdalek1967 at gmail.com writes:
Besides, if I want to deploy 50 systems for a cluster, one at a time in
parallel what do you recommend? via handbook? The modern diversity of
hardware options has rendered the gentoo
James wrote:
Dale rdalek1967 at gmail.com writes:
James wrote:
What I really would appreciate is some feedback on the Planning
Questions listed below, as to help folks organized their thoughts and
hardware details BEFORE actually performing an install or test-drive.
Many/most of these
Jeremi Piotrowski jeremi.piotrowski at gmail.com writes:
Planning questions are an OK-ish idea, but I surely wouldn't link to
derivative distributions to answer them. We have appropriate wiki pages
for all options, those that are insufficient should be improved. These
could be linked to so
Dale rdalek1967 at gmail.com writes:
James wrote:
What I really would appreciate is some feedback on the Planning
Questions listed below, as to help folks organized their thoughts and
hardware details BEFORE actually performing an install or test-drive.
Many/most of these options
10 matches
Mail list logo
