Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Java wants cups?

2022-04-03 Thread Arve Barsnes
On Sun, 3 Apr 2022 at 18:43, Matthias Hanft wrote: > And jdk-11 seems to need just openjdk (and not icedtea any more). > > This is because icedtea doesn't exist for java 11 (at least in portage). If you don't need it for anything in particular, I would go with your initial thought to just mask

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Java wants cups?

2022-04-03 Thread Matthias Hanft
Martin Vaeth wrote: > > I guess that virtual/jdk prefers the non-binary package, and apparently > portage is not able to resolve the conflict automatically by letting the > binary package satisfy the dependency. If you manually install openjdk-bin, > the problem is probably resolved. Ahhh...

[gentoo-user] Re: Java wants cups?

2022-04-03 Thread Martin Vaeth
Matthias Hanft wrote: > > Meanwhile I have found out that the culprit is "virtual/jdk". No, the “culprit” is that you do not use the binary package openjdk and you did apparently in the case of icedtea. Icedtea and openjdk both have cups as a USE-flag, but this influences only the runtime