On Fri, 14 Mar 2014 13:05:33 +0800, Guido Budack wrote:
nice on but doesn't tell me why the md5sum isn't correct...
Usually I don't check the sums if it isn't 'critical' stuff or an OS.
So after I checked the other sources and files I figured out that ALL
md5sums are incorrect but the
On Fri, 14 Mar 2014 08:49:51 +0800, Guido Budack gla...@yandex.com
wrote:
md5sum livedvd-amd64-multilib-20121221.iso
And now, any suggestion?
You don't specifically state what you are after, but I'll mention some
stuff anyway.
The gentoo livedvds are mostly meant as a showcase of gentoo's
nice on but doesn't tell me why the md5sum isn't correct...
Usually I don't check the sums if it isn't 'critical' stuff or an OS.
So after I checked the other sources and files I figured out that ALL md5sums
are incorrect but the file-sizes aren't.
In that case either the media is corrupted or my
On Sunday 24 February 2008, »Q« wrote:
Stroller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm thinking of something like md5sum for directories.
I think you may have gotten better solutions for your situation, but
md5deep (in portage) is like md5sum but with directory recursion.
I'm probably not suggesting
Stroller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm thinking of something like md5sum for directories.
I think you may have gotten better solutions for your situation, but
md5deep (in portage) is like md5sum but with directory recursion.
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
5 matches
Mail list logo