On Sun, 6 Dec 2015 10:03:46 +, Mick wrote:
> Thank you Neil! I couldn't find the FAQ page when I had a cursory look
> at the beginning. This looks like a very flexible and quite secure
> option for tunnelling connections, especially as they plan to implement
> PFS in the near future. From w
On Sunday 06 Dec 2015 09:24:51 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Dec 2015 18:49:16 +, Mick wrote:
> > > It's basically a P2P VPN. You set up a network on the controller and
> > > then join it from various machines. Those machines register with the
> > > network controller, and receive an IP addr
On Sat, 5 Dec 2015 18:49:16 +, Mick wrote:
> > It's basically a P2P VPN. You set up a network on the controller and
> > then join it from various machines. Those machines register with the
> > network controller, and receive an IP address from it, but the actual
> > communication is direct bet
On Saturday 05 Dec 2015 14:31:57 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Dec 2015 14:13:00 +, Mick wrote:
> > Neil, could you please spare a couple of words to explain how the
> > zerotier architecture works?
>
> I can do it in one word - magic!
:-)
> It's basically a P2P VPN. You set up a netwo
On Sat, 5 Dec 2015 14:13:00 +, Mick wrote:
> Neil, could you please spare a couple of words to explain how the
> zerotier architecture works?
I can do it in one word - magic!
It's basically a P2P VPN. You set up a network on the controller and then
join it from various machines. Those machin
On Saturday 05 Dec 2015 13:55:32 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Dec 2015 14:47:28 +0100, Remy Blank wrote:
> > > I discovered zerotier-one some months ago and wouldn't be without it
> > > now, especially when they released an Android client. What problems
> > > did you have?
> >
> > zerotier loo
On Sat, 5 Dec 2015 14:47:28 +0100, Remy Blank wrote:
> > I discovered zerotier-one some months ago and wouldn't be without it
> > now, especially when they released an Android client. What problems
> > did you have?
>
> zerotier looks awesome. Do you have an ebuild for it? A quick search
> didn
Neil Bothwick wrote on 2015-12-04 23:11:
> On Fri, 04 Dec 2015 17:05:49 +, Peter Humphrey wrote:
>
>> Thanks for the reply, Alan. I did some more poking around and found
>> that removing zerotier-one and netmount from the default run-level
>> fixed it. Or maybe it was just coincidence again -
8 matches
Mail list logo
