[gentoo-user] Re: Other encrypt otions than encfs

[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> yazmış: > Nick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> dm-crypt[1] and loop-aes[2] are two alternatives. The former has been > >> very reliable for me so far. > >> > >> [1] http://www.saout.de/misc/dm-crypt/ > > > > Yep, I've been using dm-crypt with LUKS for a w

[gentoo-user] Re: Other encrypt otions than encfs

Nick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> dm-crypt[1] and loop-aes[2] are two alternatives. The former has been >> very reliable for me so far. >> >> [1] http://www.saout.de/misc/dm-crypt/ > > Yep, I've been using dm-crypt with LUKS for a while now, without any > problems whatsoever. Asks mer for the

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Other encrypt otions than encfs

On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 10:22:02PM +0300, Ali Polatel wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> yazmış: > > I've had two incidents where encfs has failed due to some > > incompatability during upgrades.. > > > > I'd like to switch to some other technique rather than have to worry > > with mai

[gentoo-user] Re: Other encrypt otions than encfs

[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> yazmış: > I've had two incidents where encfs has failed due to some > incompatability during upgrades.. > > I'd like to switch to some other technique rather than have to worry > with maintaining a working environment for encfs/fuse. > > Can anyone vouch for