Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Rail Model font for coders
Apparently, though unproven, at 02:02 on Sunday 23 January 2011, Stroller did opine thusly: > On 20/1/2011, at 10:08pm, Nuno J. Silva wrote: > > Nikos Chantziaras writes: > >> On 01/20/2011 11:14 AM, > >> hare_krsna_hare_krsna_krsna_krsna_hare_hare_hare_rama_hare_rama_rama_ram > >> a_hare_h...@l
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Rail Model font for coders
On 20/1/2011, at 10:08pm, Nuno J. Silva wrote: > Nikos Chantziaras writes: > >> On 01/20/2011 11:14 AM, >> hare_krsna_hare_krsna_krsna_krsna_hare_hare_hare_rama_hare_rama_rama_rama_hare_h...@lavabit.com > > I am against hard limits on username lengths, but I think that > uuencoding the result o
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Rail Model font for coders
2011-01-22
Thread
hare_krsna_hare_krsna_krsna_krsna_hare_hare_hare_rama_hare_rama_rama_rama_hare_hare
> I just think it goes too far for a description about the font, nothing > specific against philosophy. Meeku: What tends to happen in font design that certain issues tend to be closed/buried or muted and thus I wanted to be open about it.
[gentoo-user] Re: Rail Model font for coders
hare_krsna_hare_krsna_krsna_krsna_hare_hare_hare_rama_hare_rama_rama_rama_hare_h...@lavabit.com writes: >> I think the expression you're looking for is "non sequitur". > > Meeku: It follows neatly and just because it is out-of-the-box spiritual > philosophy does not mean it's "non sequitur". I j
[gentoo-user] Re: Rail Model font for coders
Nikos Chantziaras writes: > On 01/21/2011 12:08 AM, Nuno J. Silva wrote: >> Nikos Chantziaras writes: >> >>> On 01/20/2011 11:14 AM, >>> hare_krsna_hare_krsna_krsna_krsna_hare_hare_hare_rama_hare_rama_rama_rama_hare_h...@lavabit.com >> >> I am against hard limits on username lengths, but I think
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Rail Model font for coders
2011-01-21
Thread
hare_krsna_hare_krsna_krsna_krsna_hare_hare_hare_rama_hare_rama_rama_rama_hare_hare
> I think the expression you're looking for is "non sequitur". Meeku: It follows neatly and just because it is out-of-the-box spiritual philosophy does not mean it's "non sequitur".
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Rail Model font for coders
Nikos Chantziaras wrote: On 01/21/2011 12:08 AM, Nuno J. Silva wrote: Nikos Chantziaras writes: On 01/20/2011 11:14 AM, hare_krsna_hare_krsna_krsna_krsna_hare_hare_hare_rama_hare_rama_rama_rama_hare_h...@lavabit.com I am against hard limits on username lengths, but I think that uuencoding
[gentoo-user] Re: Rail Model font for coders
On 01/21/2011 12:08 AM, Nuno J. Silva wrote: Nikos Chantziaras writes: On 01/20/2011 11:14 AM, hare_krsna_hare_krsna_krsna_krsna_hare_hare_hare_rama_hare_rama_rama_rama_hare_h...@lavabit.com I am against hard limits on username lengths, but I think that uuencoding the result of gzipping that
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Rail Model font for coders
On 01/20/11 17:08, Nuno J. Silva wrote: > Nikos Chantziaras writes: > >> On 01/20/2011 11:14 AM, >> hare_krsna_hare_krsna_krsna_krsna_hare_hare_hare_rama_hare_rama_rama_rama_hare_h...@lavabit.com > > I am against hard limits on username lengths, but I think that > uuencoding the result of gzippi
[gentoo-user] Re: Rail Model font for coders
Nikos Chantziaras writes: > On 01/20/2011 11:14 AM, > hare_krsna_hare_krsna_krsna_krsna_hare_hare_hare_rama_hare_rama_rama_rama_hare_h...@lavabit.com I am against hard limits on username lengths, but I think that uuencoding the result of gzipping that address yelds a more readable address. > wr
