Am 19.12.2011 12:36, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
> Am 19.12.2011 12:01, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
>
>> Built my kernel for a start, runs fine.
>> Considering to emerge world after a nice backup ;-)
>
> correction: emerge system for a start ... sure ...
update:
running my ~amd64 system wit
Am 19.12.2011 12:01, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
> Built my kernel for a start, runs fine.
> Considering to emerge world after a nice backup ;-)
correction: emerge system for a start ... sure ...
Am 18.11.2011 01:04, schrieb Neil Bothwick:
> If you're feeling adventurous, GCC 4.6, currently masked for
> testing, has specific -march options for the i7 and Sandybridge i7,
> according to the Gentoo Wiki CFLAGS page.
Being adventurous now.
compiled sys-devel/gcc-4.6.2, and set
CFLAGS="-O2 -
Am 24.11.2011 18:20, schrieb Michael Mol:
> Never tried mix & match with Intel. I'd say it's worth a try, as long as
> you can stay away from the proprietary drivers. Sounds likely you'll be
> hunting for a new card, though.
planning to get into my car after my first coffee ...
thx, greets, Stefa
On Nov 24, 2011 11:33 AM, "Stefan G. Weichinger" wrote:
>
> Am 24.11.2011 16:06, schrieb Michael Mol:
>
> > Is the onboard video of the same chipset as your video card? If so,
> > you should be able to run them just fine at the same time. I once had
> > an onboard ATI chipset (HD3200) working toge
Am 24.11.2011 16:06, schrieb Michael Mol:
> Is the onboard video of the same chipset as your video card? If so,
> you should be able to run them just fine at the same time. I once had
> an onboard ATI chipset (HD3200) working together with a Radeon 5770 to
> push five displays--two VGA, two DVI an
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 6:25 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Am 24.11.2011 10:53, schrieb Neil Bothwick:
>
>> Is there no on-board video?
>
> Yes, there is.
>
> yesterday: Enabled it, removed the PCIe-card, removed the "Do not
> remove"-covers from the onboard-DVI-connectors
>
> Unfortunate
Am 24.11.2011 10:53, schrieb Neil Bothwick:
> Is there no on-board video?
Yes, there is.
yesterday: Enabled it, removed the PCIe-card, removed the "Do not
remove"-covers from the onboard-DVI-connectors
Unfortunately only one of these brings analog signal, the other one is
DVI-D so it
On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 06:22:45 +0100, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> > DVI-I outputs may be converted to VGA with a simple adapter; the
> > connector at the computer contains both analog and digital
> > signaling.
>
> If there is only one ... this results in one VGA-output only as well ...
> and I
Fair enough. :)
ZZ
On Nov 24, 2011 12:25 AM, "Stefan G. Weichinger" wrote:
> Am 2011-11-24 00:45, schrieb Michael Mol:
> > DVI-I outputs may be converted to VGA with a simple adapter; the
> > connector at the computer contains both analog and digital signaling.
>
> If there is only one ... this
Am 2011-11-24 00:45, schrieb Michael Mol:
> DVI-I outputs may be converted to VGA with a simple adapter; the
> connector at the computer contains both analog and digital signaling.
If there is only one ... this results in one VGA-output only as well ...
and I need 2.
DVI-I outputs may be converted to VGA with a simple adapter; the connector
at the computer contains both analog and digital signaling.
ZZ
On Nov 23, 2011 5:42 PM, "Stefan G. Weichinger" wrote:
> Am 2011-11-23 20:02, schrieb Michael Mol:
>
> > ISTR gcc's i7 optimizations giving someone in here tr
Am 2011-11-23 20:02, schrieb Michael Mol:
> ISTR gcc's i7 optimizations giving someone in here trouble within the
> last couple weeks. As I recall, they dropped back to march and mtune=core2.
I don't expect wonders from the new compiler and its options. For now I
am more constrained by the fact t
Am 23.11.2011 18:05, schrieb Michael Mol:
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>>
>> Ad CFLAGS for i7-2600:
>>
>> Is that too much ricer-style? -->
>>
>> ### gcc -march=native -E -v - &1 | sed -n 's/.* -v - //p'
>>
>> CFLAGS="-O2 -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -march=core2 -mcx16
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>
> Ad CFLAGS for i7-2600:
>
> Is that too much ricer-style? -->
>
> ### gcc -march=native -E -v - &1 | sed -n 's/.* -v - //p'
>
> CFLAGS="-O2 -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -march=core2 -mcx16 -msahf -maes
> -mpclmul -mpopcnt -mavx --param l1-ca
Ad CFLAGS for i7-2600:
Is that too much ricer-style? -->
### gcc -march=native -E -v - &1 | sed -n 's/.* -v - //p'
CFLAGS="-O2 -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -march=core2 -mcx16 -msahf -maes
-mpclmul -mpopcnt -mavx --param l1-cache-size=32 --param
l1-cache-line-size=64 --param l2-cache-size=8192 -mtune=g
Am 2011-11-21 09:45, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
> Am 18.11.2011 10:46, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
>> hardware order planned for next week maybe.
>
> Right now I consider simply skipping the "K"-CPU and get some pre-built
> system w/ full guarantee and stuff (even the K-CPU is outdated soon,
Am 18.11.2011 10:46, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
> hardware order planned for next week maybe.
Right now I consider simply skipping the "K"-CPU and get some pre-built
system w/ full guarantee and stuff (even the K-CPU is outdated soon, and
the "normal" i7-2600 is also much faster than my C2D-E66
Am 2011-11-18 01:04, schrieb Neil Bothwick:
> On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 23:13:31 +0100, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>
>> Right now I have everything built with rather CPU-specific
>> CFLAGS.
>>
>> Specific L1/L2-cache-sizes and stuff, set after doing something
>> like "gcc -Q --help=target -march=nativ
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 23:13:31 +0100, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Right now I have everything built with rather CPU-specific CFLAGS.
>
> Specific L1/L2-cache-sizes and stuff, set after doing something like
> "gcc -Q --help=target -march=native" (gentoo wiki).
>
> I wonder if this C2D-E6600-
Am 2011-11-17 11:44, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
> Am 2011-11-17 02:27, schrieb Neil Bothwick:
>> On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 22:33:24 +0100, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>>
>>> I think i7-2600k is the sweet spot right now.
>>
>> It's working nicely for me. I can't believe the difference in
>> compile tim
Am 2011-11-17 02:27, schrieb Neil Bothwick:
> On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 22:33:24 +0100, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>
>> I think i7-2600k is the sweet spot right now.
>
> It's working nicely for me. I can't believe the difference in
> compile times, it's almost like using a binary distro.
Wow, sounds
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 5:27 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 22:33:24 +0100, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>
>> I think i7-2600k is the sweet spot right now.
>
> It's working nicely for me. I can't believe the difference in compile
> times, it's almost like using a binary distro.
>>
>
On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 22:33:24 +0100, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> I think i7-2600k is the sweet spot right now.
It's working nicely for me. I can't believe the difference in compile
times, it's almost like using a binary distro.
>
> What board did you choose?
>
Gigabyte Z68X-UD3H-B3
It seemed
Am 16.11.2011 20:23, schrieb Neil Bothwick:
>> True but Intel's MSRP was just $10-15 more than a 2600K. Vendors
>> decided to up the price a bit. Not uncommon with new products.
>
> That makes sense, if the old version is only a tenner less than the
> new one, no one would buy it, so they get di
On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 20:05:55 +0200, masterprometheus wrote:
> > Yep. So Intel noticed "wow, we get a few of them which run stable even
> > at 100MHz more, let's sell them for some more money" ;-)
>
> True but Intel's MSRP was just $10-15 more than a 2600K. Vendors
> decided to up the price a
Am 16.11.2011 19:05, schrieb masterprometheus:
> Oh I would definitly do that (overclock it I mean). But if there
> isn't someone with the same name, you've said :
>
>> I ask myself if I need the K-version at all, I don't want to
>> overclock ...
>
> Change of heart ? Understandable as these CPU
Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Am 2011-11-16 16:22, schrieb masterprometheus:
>> Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>> I ask myself if I need the K-version at all, I don't want to
>>> overclock
>>
>> No, if you're not going to overclock the K version is not needed.
>
> But as far as I read
28 matches
Mail list logo