[gentoo-user] Re: Re: separate / and /usr to require initramfs 2013-11-01

2013-10-11 Thread Steven J. Long
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 09:42:33AM +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote: On Fri, 11 Oct 2013 09:36:02 +0100, Steven J. Long wrote: It's evolution. Linux has for years been moving in this direction, now it has reached the point where the Gentoo devs can no longer devote the increasing time needed

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: separate / and /usr to require initramfs 2013-11-01

2013-10-11 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Fri, 11 Oct 2013 12:27:59 +0100, Steven J. Long wrote: I don't understand why people keep banging on about Poettering in this, previously finished, thread. You brought up the background, wrt Greg K-H. Regardless of how you feel, I'm not alone in considering Poettering's (and

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: separate / and /usr to require initramfs 2013-11-01

2013-10-11 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Friday 11 Oct 2013 12:55:55 Neil Bothwick wrote: While I'm loathe to use words like underhanded, ... pedant Not loathe here but loath or even loth. /pedant (Just to help non-native speakers avoid confusion, you understand.) :-) -- Regards, Peter

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: separate / and /usr to require initramfs 2013-11-01

2013-10-11 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Fri, 11 Oct 2013 14:11:55 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote: While I'm loathe to use words like underhanded, ... pedant Not loathe here but loath or even loth. /pedant Ouch! -- Neil Bothwick Mac screen message: Like, dude, something went wrong. signature.asc Description: PGP