Re: [gentoo-user] Re: SERVFAIL with bind; problems in named.conf?

2011-10-05 Thread Andrey Moshbear
The zone file was 640 root:root. It should've been 640 root:named.

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: SERVFAIL with bind; problems in named.conf?

2011-10-05 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Wed, 5 Oct 2011 13:29:40 -0400 Andrey Moshbear wrote: > Bit by yet another EPERM :/ > An EPERM you say? How ... fascinating. Care to elaborate? -- Alan McKinnnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: SERVFAIL with bind; problems in named.conf?

2011-10-05 Thread Andrey Moshbear
Bit by yet another EPERM :/

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: SERVFAIL with bind; problems in named.conf?

2011-10-05 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Wed, 5 Oct 2011 09:38:01 -0400 Andrey Moshbear wrote: > No clue, as logging isn't yet enabled. However, chechzone says that > all is fine. Well that's your primary error right there. How can you run a daemon that isn't logging and consider that even halfway proper? Get some real logs from whe

[gentoo-user] Re: SERVFAIL with bind; problems in named.conf?

2011-10-05 Thread Andrey Moshbear
No clue, as logging isn't yet enabled. However, chechzone says that all is fine. On 2011-10-05, Alan McKinnon wrote: > On Wed, 5 Oct 2011 05:06:27 -0400 > Andrey Moshbear wrote: > >> For bind, I have the following as named.conf: >> >> acl "xfer" { none; }; >> >> acl "trusted" { 127.0.0.0/8; ::1/