Konstantinos Agouros <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> yazmış:
> Hi,
>
> will there be a unionfs for 2.6.20 kernels? AFAIK there's only the 1.5_pre
> for 2.6.19.
>
> Regards,
>
> Konstantin
You should use unionfs version 2.0 which is a part of -mm tree. You can
either get mm-sources or manually patch your k
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> yazmış:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Norberto Bensa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Friday, June 01, 2007 9:29 AM
> > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
> > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Unionfs
> -Original Message-
> From: Norberto Bensa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, June 01, 2007 9:29 AM
> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Unionfs for 2.6.20
>
>
> Ali Polatel wrote:
> > You should use unionfs vers
Ali Polatel wrote:
> You should use unionfs version 2.0 which is a part of -mm tree. You can
> either get mm-sources or manually patch your kernel. Have a look at
> http://www.am-utils.org/project-unionfs.html for more info..
But there's no unionfs-utils unless you're using sabayon overlay...
Re
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have seen many people mentioning UnionFS.
> What exactly is it, and what does it do?
> (:P Besides the statement that it is an FS.)
Let's ask our friend: http://www.google.com/search?q=unionfs
http://www.am-utils.org/project-unionfs.html
Great for livecds (among oth
> -Original Message-
> From: Ali Polatel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, June 01, 2007 10:46 AM
> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
> Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Unionfs for 2.6.20
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> yazmış:
> >
6 matches
Mail list logo
