maxim wexler wrote:
> What does the group think?
I don't know about the group, but I use etc-update and keep all of /etc
in a Subversion working copy. This allows quickly seeing any changes
made on updates and emerges, reverting changes if anything breaks, and
keeping track of the reasons for spec
I much prefer dispatch-conf. I just find it easier to use. I find
etc-update a touch crude in the way it takes input.
On 10/13/06, Remy Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
maxim wexler wrote:
> What does the group think?
I don't know about the group, but I use etc-update and keep all of /etc
in
I use dispatch-conf all the time. I too have never looked back.
I use diff="vimdiff -R %s %s" in /etc/dispatch-conf.conf
NOT SURE WHAT '-R' IS now though. Perhaps it should not be there.
Then I add the following line to my .vimrc, which allows me to press
F2 to exit the vimdiff windows in one
On Saturday 14 October 2006 06:21, Trenton Adams wrote:
> I use dispatch-conf all the time. I too have never looked back.
>
> I use diff="vimdiff -R %s %s" in /etc/dispatch-conf.conf
>
> NOT SURE WHAT '-R' IS now though. Perhaps it should not be there.
>
-R tells vim to be read only, so you cann
On 10/14/06, Steve Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Saturday 14 October 2006 06:21, Trenton Adams wrote:
> I use dispatch-conf all the time. I too have never looked back.
>
> I use diff="vimdiff -R %s %s" in /etc/dispatch-conf.conf
>
> NOT SURE WHAT '-R' IS now though. Perhaps it should not
On 10/13/06, Remy Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
maxim wexler wrote:
> What does the group think?
I don't know about the group, but I use etc-update and keep all of /etc
in a Subversion working copy. This allows quickly seeing any changes
made on updates and emerges, reverting changes if anyth
6 matches
Mail list logo
