[gentoo-user] Re: libreoffice-bin-3.4.3.2-r1 & sun-jdk-1.6.0.29 on x86_64

2012-01-16 Thread walt
On 01/15/2012 07:05 PM, Hartmut Figge wrote: > Greetings, > > on my x86_64 libreoffice fails to detect Java. I am getting this when > starting lowriter: > > hafi@i5_64 ~ $ lowriter > Warning: failed to launch javaldx - java may not fuction correctly > > Calculating dependencies... done! > [ebuil

[gentoo-user] Re: libreoffice-bin-3.4.3.2-r1 & sun-jdk-1.6.0.29 on x86_64

2012-01-16 Thread Hartmut Figge
walt: >On 01/15/2012 07:05 PM, Hartmut Figge wrote: >> on my x86_64 libreoffice fails to detect Java. I am getting this when >> starting lowriter: >> >> hafi@i5_64 ~ $ lowriter >> Warning: failed to launch javaldx - java may not fuction correctly >> >> Calculating dependencies... done! >> [ebuil

[gentoo-user] Re: libreoffice-bin-3.4.3.2-r1 & sun-jdk-1.6.0.29 on x86_64

2012-01-16 Thread walt
On 01/16/2012 04:12 AM, Hartmut Figge wrote: > There is a difference to my x86_64 Gentoo that *may* be important > > x86:64: > Available Java Virtual Machines: > [1] sun-jdk-1.6 system-vm > > i686: > Available Java Virtual Machines: > [1] sun-jdk-1.6 system-vm user-vm > > On i686 there

[gentoo-user] Re: libreoffice-bin-3.4.3.2-r1 & sun-jdk-1.6.0.29 on x86_64

2012-01-16 Thread Hartmut Figge
walt: >I never had user-vm set until just now. It made no difference AFAICT. I am not seeing a difference also. >It seems that your java environment is somehow broken, but I don't know >why. Some part of libreoffice thinks that javaldx is available when it's >not. What does java -version say?

[gentoo-user] Re: libreoffice-bin-3.4.3.2-r1 & sun-jdk-1.6.0.29 on x86_64

2012-01-16 Thread walt
On 01/16/2012 10:15 AM, Hartmut Figge wrote: >> The shotgun approach may work :) > Would have been nice if it worked. But unfortunately... *g* Oh, I forgot shotgun v.2 :) When faced with something as complex as libreoffice I usually create a brand new user account and try running it from there,

[gentoo-user] Re: libreoffice-bin-3.4.3.2-r1 & sun-jdk-1.6.0.29 on x86_64

2012-01-16 Thread Hartmut Figge
walt: >Oh, I forgot shotgun v.2 :) When faced with something as complex >as libreoffice I usually create a brand new user account and try >running it from there, to rule out breakage in my home directory. Fine to know about this. :) But... ;) I could try the unstable sun-jdk. I could try an old

[gentoo-user] Re: libreoffice-bin-3.4.3.2-r1 & sun-jdk-1.6.0.29 on x86_64

2012-01-16 Thread Hartmut Figge
James Broadhead: [libreoffice-bin-3.4.3.2-r1] >It's actually looking for java-1.7 ; but seems to work fine with 1.6 Tcha. Not here. icedtea-bin-1.10.4 isn't found by libreoffice either. Hartmut -- Usenet-ABC-Wiki http://www.usenet-abc.de/wiki/ Von Usern fuer User :-)

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: libreoffice-bin-3.4.3.2-r1 & sun-jdk-1.6.0.29 on x86_64

2012-01-16 Thread James Broadhead
On 16 January 2012 19:51, Hartmut Figge wrote: > walt: > >>Oh, I forgot shotgun v.2 :)  When faced with something as complex >>as libreoffice I usually create a brand new user account and try >>running it from there, to rule out breakage in my home directory. > > Fine to know about this. :) But...