Re: [gentoo-user] TCP Advanced Congestion Control -- any difference?

2011-10-23 Thread Pandu Poluan
On Oct 23, 2011 7:07 PM, "Florian Philipp" wrote: > > Am 20.10.2011 18:11, schrieb Florian Philipp: > > Am 20.10.2011 15:10, schrieb Pandu Poluan: > >> Like the subject said: I am wondering if using a non-default TCP > >> Advanced Congestion Control makes any difference. > >> > >> (The default is

Re: [gentoo-user] TCP Advanced Congestion Control -- any difference?

2011-10-23 Thread Florian Philipp
Am 20.10.2011 18:11, schrieb Florian Philipp: > Am 20.10.2011 15:10, schrieb Pandu Poluan: >> Like the subject said: I am wondering if using a non-default TCP >> Advanced Congestion Control makes any difference. >> >> (The default is "cubic", but there are alternatives such as "htcp", >> "hybla", a

Re: [gentoo-user] TCP Advanced Congestion Control -- any difference?

2011-10-20 Thread Florian Philipp
Am 20.10.2011 15:10, schrieb Pandu Poluan: > Like the subject said: I am wondering if using a non-default TCP > Advanced Congestion Control makes any difference. > > (The default is "cubic", but there are alternatives such as "htcp", > "hybla", and "yeah") > > Any experiences? > I tested it on

[gentoo-user] TCP Advanced Congestion Control -- any difference?

2011-10-20 Thread Pandu Poluan
Like the subject said: I am wondering if using a non-default TCP Advanced Congestion Control makes any difference. (The default is "cubic", but there are alternatives such as "htcp", "hybla", and "yeah") Any experiences? Rgds, -- FdS Pandu E Poluan ~ IT Optimizer ~  • LOPSA Member #15248  • Blo