Enrico Weigelt wrote:
* Teresa and Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Learn something every day. So if I remove the doc USE flag that will
not remove the man page? That would be cool. I wonder how much space
that takes up?
hmm, is there also an man useflag or some other option to kick
of ma
Michael Schreckenbauer wrote:
>Am Freitag, 2. Juni 2006 12:41 schrieb Teresa and Dale:
>
>
>>Enrico Weigelt wrote:
>>
>>
>>>* Teresa and Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
Learn something every day. So if I remove the doc USE flag that will
not remove the man
Am Freitag, 2. Juni 2006 12:41 schrieb Teresa and Dale:
> Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> >* Teresa and Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >>Learn something every day. So if I remove the doc USE flag that will
> >>not remove the man page? That would be cool. I wonder how much space
> >>that t
Enrico Weigelt wrote:
>* Teresa and Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>>Learn something every day. So if I remove the doc USE flag that will
>>not remove the man page? That would be cool. I wonder how much space
>>that takes up?
>>
>>
>
>hmm, is there also an man useflag or some o
* Teresa and Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Learn something every day. So if I remove the doc USE flag that will
> not remove the man page? That would be cool. I wonder how much space
> that takes up?
hmm, is there also an man useflag or some other option to kick
of manpages (I personally
Neil Bothwick wrote:
>On Wed, 31 May 2006 15:15:31 -0500, Teresa and Dale wrote:
>
>
>
>>This is something I ran into a while back. For some reason the doc
>>would not compile for hal. I wanted the docs for everything else though
>>so putting -doc in the USE line in make.conf would remove the
On Wed, 31 May 2006 12:15:10 -0700, Ryan Tandy wrote:
> It doesn't really matter. Where you should put them depends on how you
> want them to take effect. A flag that only affects one package will
> affect that one package regardless of whether it's in make.conf or
> package.use, so I prefer
On Wed, 31 May 2006 15:15:31 -0500, Teresa and Dale wrote:
> This is something I ran into a while back. For some reason the doc
> would not compile for hal. I wanted the docs for everything else though
> so putting -doc in the USE line in make.conf would remove the docs for
> everything, not jus
Calvin Walton wrote:
>
> To tell the truth, you can put either kind of use flag in either file.
> The difference is what you want to apply the flag to.
>
> If you want only a single package to have a "global" use flag set
> differently from the rest of the system, you put it in package.use. If
> y
On 5/31/06, Anthony E. Caudel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Am I correct in thinking that USE flags in
/etc/portage/profiles/use.desc are global flags and should be placed in
/etc/make.conf whereas those in use.local.desc are only local flags and
should only be placed in /etc/portage/package.use wit
Anthony E. Caudel wrote:
Am I correct in thinking that USE flags in
/etc/portage/profiles/use.desc are global flags and should be placed in
/etc/make.conf whereas those in use.local.desc are only local flags and
should only be placed in /etc/portage/package.use with the appropriate
package?
Am I correct in thinking that USE flags in
/etc/portage/profiles/use.desc are global flags and should be placed in
/etc/make.conf whereas those in use.local.desc are only local flags and
should only be placed in /etc/portage/package.use with the appropriate
package?
Tony
--
Those who would gi
12 matches
Mail list logo
