Hi All,
See output below. I understand what this is telling me. However, the
issue is if I unmask libkexiv2 and kipi-plugins, I get further messages
about some other kde package that is masked by ~x86 keyword. And this
goes on continuously.
If I do emerge --pretend --update --deep --skip-
According to my local portage mirror, kipi-plugins-1.9.0 is currently
~x86. There's probably a stray line in
your /etc/portage/package.keywords which unmasks kipi-plugins-1.9.0.
The latest stable is kipi-plugins-1.2.0-r3 which is happy with
libkexiv2-4.4.5-r1, which in turn is stable for x86.
-rz
You can allow it to install the masked packages by typing:
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86" emerge --update --deep world (you can also use
--keep-going, instead of --skip-first and it will try and continue when it
finds errors).
Actually, you can only use ~x86 if you are using an i686 or whatever (no
good
On Sun, 27 Mar 2011 21:25:18 +0100, JM wrote:
> You can allow it to install the masked packages by typing:
>
> ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86" emerge --update --deep world
That will update every package to the latest ~x86 version, and cause them
all to downgrade again the next time you emerge world. As t
On 03/27/11 21:54, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sun, 27 Mar 2011 21:25:18 +0100, JM wrote:
You can allow it to install the masked packages by typing:
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86" emerge --update --deep world
That will update every package to the latest ~x86 version, and cause them
all to downgrade again
On 03/27/11 19:21, Roman Zilka wrote:
According to my local portage mirror, kipi-plugins-1.9.0 is currently
~x86. There's probably a stray line in
your /etc/portage/package.keywords which unmasks kipi-plugins-1.9.0.
The latest stable is kipi-plugins-1.2.0-r3 which is happy with
libkexiv2-4.4.5-r1
On Sunday 27 March 2011 18:50:36 CJoeB wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> See output below. I understand what this is telling me. However, the
> issue is if I unmask libkexiv2 and kipi-plugins, I get further messages
> about some other kde package that is masked by ~x86 keyword. And this
> goes on continuous
On 03/27/11 22:25, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Sunday 27 March 2011 18:50:36 CJoeB wrote:
Hi All,
See output below. I understand what this is telling me. However, the
issue is if I unmask libkexiv2 and kipi-plugins, I get further messages
about some other kde package that is masked by ~x86 keywor
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 12:42 AM, CJoeB wrote:
> On 03/27/11 22:25, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>>
>> On Sunday 27 March 2011 18:50:36 CJoeB wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> See output below. I understand what this is telling me. However, the
>>> issue is if I unmask libkexiv2 and kipi-plugins, I get fur
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 3:42 PM, CJoeB wrote:
> On 03/27/11 22:25, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>>
>> On Sunday 27 March 2011 18:50:36 CJoeB wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> See output below. I understand what this is telling me. However, the
>>> issue is if I unmask libkexiv2 and kipi-plugins, I get furt
On Sun, 27 Mar 2011 22:09:15 +, CJoeB wrote:
> >> ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86" emerge --update --deep world
> > That will update every package to the latest ~x86 version, and cause
> > them all to downgrade again the next time you emerge world. As this
> > includes packages that are both critical
You're right - could the ACCEPT_KEYWORDS be only used for the troublesome
packages?
On 27 March 2011 22:54, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Mar 2011 21:25:18 +0100, JM wrote:
>
> > You can allow it to install the masked packages by typing:
> >
> > ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86" emerge --update --deep
On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 09:23:15 +0100, JM wrote:
> You're right - could the ACCEPT_KEYWORDS be only used for the
> troublesome packages?
Yes, by setting in in portage.accept_keywords.
BTW - to-posting is frowned upon on this list.
--
Neil Bothwick
Accept that some days you're the pigeon, and so
to-posting?
Am I using the wrong email address for replying to the list?
Please excuse my ignorance :)
On 28 March 2011 09:32, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 09:23:15 +0100, JM wrote:
>
> > You're right - could the ACCEPT_KEYWORDS be only used for the
> > troublesome packages?
>
>
On Monday 28 March 2011 09:43:47 JM wrote:
> to-posting?
Neil meant to say "top-posting":
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
and
http://www.caliburn.nl/topposting.html
(there are many links if you google about netiquette and usenet etiquette).
BTW, some typos like Neil's are allowed
On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 09:43:47 +0100, JM wrote:
> to-posting?
>
> Am I using the wrong email address for replying to the list?
>
> Please excuse my ignorance :)
No, I'm using a new netbook with a less sensitive keyboard than the old
one. I meant top-posting.
>
> On 28 March 2011 09:32, Neil Bot
On 28 March 2011 10:11, Mick wrote:
> On Monday 28 March 2011 09:43:47 JM wrote:
> > to-posting?
>
> Neil meant to say "top-posting":
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
>
> and
>
> http://www.caliburn.nl/topposting.html
>
> (there are many links if you google about netiquette and usen
In linux.gentoo.user, you wrote:
> --20cf3054aa33c36405049f87abd7
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> On 28 March 2011 10:11, Mick wrote:
>
>> On Monday 28 March 2011 09:43:47 JM wrote:
>> > to-posting?
>>
>> Neil meant to say "top-posting":
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postin
On Monday 28 March 2011 18:27:03 Elaine C. Sharpe wrote:
> But yes, top posting does suck -- almost as badly as all the
> "==20" crap polluting all the kmail users' messages. Almost.
Would you mind sending me an example of this from me and my kmail?
--
Rgds
Peter
In linux.gentoo.user, Peter Humphries wrote:
> On Monday 28 March 2011 18:27:03 Elaine C. Sharpe wrote:
>
>> But yes, top posting does suck -- almost as badly as all the
>> "==20" crap polluting all the kmail users' messages. Almost.
>
> Would you mind sending me an example of this from me and my k
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 1:11 PM, Elaine C. Sharpe
wrote:
> In linux.gentoo.user, Peter Humphries wrote:
>> On Monday 28 March 2011 18:27:03 Elaine C. Sharpe wrote:
>>
>>> But yes, top posting does suck -- almost as badly as all the
>>> "==20" crap polluting all the kmail users' messages. Almost.
>
In linux.gentoo.user, you wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 1:11 PM, Elaine C. Sharpe
> wrote:
>> In linux.gentoo.user, Peter Humphries wrote:
>>> On Monday 28 March 2011 18:27:03 Elaine C. Sharpe wrote:
>>>
But yes, top posting does suck -- almost as badly as all the
"==20" crap polluting
On Monday 28 March 2011 20:25:41 Elaine C. Sharpe wrote:
> Such a burden, being exceptionally competent, isn't it?
If you say so... :-)
--
Rgds
Peter
On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 14:11:55 -0400, Elaine C. Sharpe wrote:
> Apparently not everyone who uses kmail has the problem.
> Maybe it's the people who use html mail?
> Neil Bothwick's posts often have the "==20", but usually just one or
> two. Some posts are positively riddled with them, to the point o
In linux.gentoo.user, you wrote:
> --Sig_/TRElrs3oa099GBUkPVLmB/I
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 14:11:55 -0400, Elaine C. Sharpe wrote:
>
>> Apparently not everyone who uses kmail has the problem.
>> Maybe it's the
On 3/28/2011 6:20 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 14:11:55 -0400, Elaine C. Sharpe wrote:
>
>> Apparently not everyone who uses kmail has the problem.
>> Maybe it's the people who use html mail?
>> Neil Bothwick's posts often have the "==20", but usually just one or
>> two. Some pos
26 matches
Mail list logo
